DG, Kasper's petulance certainly didn't help matters, but it didn't cost us the game.
DG, Kasper's petulance certainly didn't help matters, but it didn't cost us the game.
Whilst the opposite number gets away with it in the same game no doubt
It certainly did, in an indirect kind of way.
How?
He wasn't the frigging numpty in goal, he wasn't the defender the should've closed the player down before he crossed the ball, he wasn't the defender behind said numpty that ducked down because numpty was coming for the ball, and, he wasn't the defender being fouled by Boateng.
So, please tell me, HOW did he cost us the game.
It's hard because I think he does need to tell the other players what he can see and where they are going wrong, and I have no problem with him (or Wellens) doing it in their own style. I also don't really have a problem with him kicking the ball out when we concede, the majority of goalkeepers do it and get away with it. However, I do think he needs to calm down.
Did not see the game but honest reports seem to be of an excellent all round better performance. Did Nugent and Vassell present more of a threat together, even though Fernandez got a goal and an unselfish assist?
They complimented each other very well.
How?
He wasn't the frigging numpty in goal, he wasn't the defender the should've closed the player down before he crossed the ball, he wasn't the defender behind said numpty that ducked down because numpty was coming for the ball, and, he wasn't the defender being fouled by Boateng.
So, please tell me, HOW did he cost us the game.
I think bollocking is a very over-rated form of management and not appropriate in this case.
Kasper's actions lost us the match and he clearly knows this. At the moment his morale is likely to be low and he will feel he has let down the team. This is the time when he needs to know he has the full support not only of the manager but the rest of the team - and I would suggest on Saturday the support of the supporters.I think Kasper is the best goalkeeper we have had since Fulop but he is a young man who has been let go by Man City and then Leeds. Young men need a supportive environment and he needs to know that in Leicester he has found the club where he belongs
Possibly. But that's part of the disbenefits of having blond hair and a famous dad.
Well we'll have to agree to disagree.Erm really? He was the chap who got sent off after acting like bell end, you know the one, the guy who was responsible for that lad Weale coming on, the player who ****ed up quite monumentally on the cross. He was also the lad responsible for the team losing their head. So as I said, Indirectly he was responsible.
I'm willing to stand corrected but is this really part of the lexicon?:icon_bigg
Ha, just donning the sackcloth. Obviously an archaic word rarely used in modern parlance:icon_wink
:icon_redfOn the contrary. First known use of the word was in 1968
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
10 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
11 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
12 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
13 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
14 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
15 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |