Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Nope, still sacked.Is he In yet?
Nope, still sacked.Is he In yet?
I'm interested to know what people have seen since February that would give them hope that Pearson is the right man for the job?
Multiple choice anwers:
a)lots of people only feel secure whilst the same manager is in situ irrespective of outcomes;
b)Shrewd posters examplified by Matt B are not hooked on success as a criteria in management tho' would probably admit to facing a dilemna as to whether they would prefer Conference North or Conference South;
c)Pearson defied the odds and led us into the play offs notwithstanding that this was against a background of being nailed on automatic promotion contenders a few months earlier - before he stuffed it up;
d) The motto of the City of Leicester is' Semper Eadem' - always the same. We like that and look forward to Pearson telling us the same stories next season 'We were very unlucky'- murdered them '0-3'; 'We played great football and they just scored some lucky goals'.
e) The owners are sick of wasting money on LCFC only to be thanked with falling attendances and repeat failure and keeping on a contracted Nigel is the cheaper option;
f) There ain't a lot of potential manager options at this point in time.
Hold tight for more of the same till at least the end May 2014.
Multiple choice anwers:
a)lots of people only feel secure whilst the same manager is in situ irrespective of outcomes;
b)Shrewd posters examplified by Matt B are not hooked on success as a criteria in management tho' would probably admit to facing a dilemna as to whether they would prefer Conference North or Conference South;
c)Pearson defied the odds and led us into the play offs notwithstanding that this was against a background of being nailed on automatic promotion contenders a few months earlier - before he stuffed it up;
d) The motto of the City of Leicester is' Semper Eadem' - always the same. We like that and look forward to Pearson telling us the same stories next season 'We were very unlucky'- murdered them '0-3'; 'We played great football and they just scored some lucky goals'.
e) The owners are sick of wasting money on LCFC only to be thanked with falling attendances and repeat failure and keeping on a contracted Nigel is the cheaper option;
f) There ain't a lot of potential manager options at this point in time.
Hold tight for more of the same till at least the end May 2014.
d) The motto of the City of Leicester is' Semper Eadem' - always the same. We like that and look forward to Pearson telling us the same stories next season 'We were very unlucky'- murdered them '0-3';
Ooh, I know this one! West Brom away, three years ago.I've had enough of all the 3-0 defeats we've had under Pearson. Well, the one 3-0 defeat we've had in almost 200 games under Pearson.
I'm not sure why your first two questions were obtuse considering i'd already made comments to a collapse in February earlier in this thread.Which February do you mean? Why have you chosen February? What do you see as being the job? Are you sure that your idea of the job is the best for the future of the club? Do you like arguments/discussions that go round and round and r...
I personally don't think scraping 6th is reason to stick with him.
I would say, with the alternative managers who have been mooted, it would be too risky to throw everything up in the air and go with one of the deadbeats mentioned so far.I am not criticizing his signings - just his tactical ability and ability to get us over the finish line. I think he has got us to a point where we can with a little tweaking get promoted (like Cardiff) but have significant doubts whether he is the best person to do it. Why didn't Cardiff stay with Dave Jones - he kept getting them to the playoffs. Time for a change - the other option is too risky.
Lots of calls for us to get a few experienced players in next year.
I'm not sure quite how we can achieve that without getting some decent money for some of our better players. Last year we reportedly made a loss of some £30 million. Next year we are not allowed to exceed £3 million (with an extra £5 million if the owners 'gift' us that extra £5 million). I am struggling to make the maths work just on the basis of us standing still without adding any extra players into the equation.
I'm sorry but if you can't see the disasters that went on prior to him joining the club and feel that it had nothing to do with us going down that year, then more fool you.
Like I said he wasn't my first choice, I tagged him on the end of my list and put 'even' before his name, which clearly indicated that the was nowhere near my first choice. I stand by my opinion that he's a better manager than Pearson though...and guess what he proved it tonight by getting Palace to Wembley. Pearson has got one promotion and two play failures. Yes ok, but his promotion was from a lower tier, so it doesn't stack up against someone who has done it at this level.
I'm not sure how you can say Palace have steadily declined. They had a poor run of form yes, but the fact that Freedman was prepared to walk and take the Bolton job suggests that he never thought they'd finish in the play offs and Holloway has gone and done that. Holloway is a good manager at this level. What he's done since our relegation season has proved that. You may hate him because of his links to our lowest moments in our club's history but the truth is he's a scapegoat and not the real felon.
I know I might be accused of sweeping generalisation, but does it seem to anybody else that the majority of people who are calling for a change in manager do not live in the city or its nearabouts and do not attend live matches whilst the majority of people who are happy for NP to stay do regularly get to attend games? I know there are noteworthy exceptions but it does seem to me that there is a clear split on these lines.
I know I might be accused of sweeping generalisation, but does it seem to anybody else that the majority of people who are calling for a change in manager do not live in the city or its nearabouts and do not attend live matches whilst the majority of people who are happy for NP to stay do regularly get to attend games? I know there are noteworthy exceptions but it does seem to me that there is a clear split on these lines.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
10 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
11 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
12 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
13 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
14 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
15 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
18 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |