Macky
Gruntled Member
Why do people keep ignoring the role Wayne Brown played in the first leg defeat!
Especially when they're trying their hardest to slag Pearson. I just can't understand it
Why do people keep ignoring the role Wayne Brown played in the first leg defeat!
Thats the bit that gets me, if Milan really wanted to keep him he would have denied permission and Nigel would have to then resign.
Isnt that what all of us deal in on here?
I wonder if you will still be saying this in Feb after our team has been dismantled by MM and we are firmly in the relegation zone. :icon_lol:
I can see possibly Hobbs and Fryatt going, but I doubt any other of our players will move on - it would completely rip the team apart and I'm sure Mandaric doesn't want that as it jeopardizes any chances of selling the club this season.
I expect 6 points from the Hull game's in the new season, that's the only response. I'm sad, angry and drunk.
Thats the bit that gets me, if Milan really wanted to keep him he would have denied permission and Nigel would have to then resign. There is more to this than meets the eye as has been mentioned on the other thread. How many other clubs during the season asked to speak to Nigel I wonder and what did Milan tell them, yeah Feck off, so why this time has he allowed it.
Yes, but surely we aren't definitely going to sell 5 or 6 of our best players solely because Pearson has left?
I can see possibly Hobbs and Fryatt going, but I doubt any other of our players will move on - it would completely rip the team apart and I'm sure Mandaric doesn't want that as it jeopardizes any chances of promotion this season.
I tell you what also jeopardizes the chances of promotion...letting a successful manager leave
What could he have done? If he couldn't afford to give in to Pearson's demands and Pearson was adamant he wanted to go then MM couldn't do anything to stop him. Contracts mean nothing in football these days.
Whereas caving in to unobtainable financial demands jeopardizes the chances of long term survival of the club. Tough call...I tell you what also jeopardizes the chances of promotion...letting a successful manager leave
I am amazed with all the good wishes that people are offering him. I wish him nothing but the worst and I would most definitely boo him if I was there when he returned.
We are in a financially perilous position. This is not exactly breaking news. Almost all, if not every team in the Cahampionship are in dire straits financially. We got relegated to League 1 and had to suffer the obvious economic consequences. We failed to win promotion this past season and so did not benefit from those economic advantages. How exactly is it Milan Mandaric's or Les Hoos's fault that we do not have a pot to piss in?
Nigle Pearson did a very good job for us. He got us up at the first time of asking from League 1 and took us to a position in the Championship that was certianly far beyond my realistic expectations. However, did he do this alone or did he do this with the help of Milan Mandaric and the LCFC board? I would argue that the relative success of the past two seasons is in no small part down to Milan Mandaric.
In Pearson's time at the club, Milan has not been his usual media-friendly rent-a-quote self. He has stayed in the background and made veey few media appearances. He has not interfered with the team and player recruitment in the way that he did when Martin Allen was here. He has backed Pearson in the transfer market. Have we spent 5 or even 2 million on one player, no. However, we have brought in the likes of Tunchev and Hobbs on permanent contracts and he has financed countless Premier League loanees, who presumably were on Premier League wages. It can't have been cheap having, Cleverley, Spearing, Vaughan, Solano etc on the wage bill. Not to mention the added wages of players like Nielsen and McGivern - two players who belonged nowhere near our club, let alone our first team. (I would love Robbie Nielson to prove me worong.)
Someone said that Milan should have refused him permission to talk to Hull and made him resign if he wanted to leave. Let him resign and lose out on 400,00 compensation - that really would be bad financial management on the part of the board. And what about forcing a manager to stay who does not want to be at our club. The same people who are saying we should refused him permission are likely the same people who were saying we should get rid of DJ Campbell because he does want to be at our club. Speaking of Campbell, maybe we can now keep him and bring in a manager who can get the best out of him. Holloway, Allen, Bruce and even Nigel Clough have all managed where Pearson failed in that regard.
Perhaps if Pearson had not totally conceded the first leg of the Play-Off semi-final to Cardiff and cost us the tie, we may have made it to Wembley and made it to the Premier League and he could have managed a club with some money in the bank.
arguably one of the best managers in the top two divisions
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |