ChrisFilter
Member
So why was it only Hull that came in for him?
Who would you rank higher in the Championship?
Under Pearson we could have gone up next season. Without him, we won't.
Last edited:
So why was it only Hull that came in for him?
So why was it only Hull that came in for him?
Who would you rank higher in the Championship?
Under Pearson we could have gone up next season. Without him, we won't.
Yep, we're doomed
To mid-table, probably. I'm not expecting this to result in relegation.
It's more of a shame than an out and out disaster.
Unless of course he is replaced by a good manager and we have a good season?
Unless of course he is replaced by a good manager and we have a good season?
Of course, but with zero funds any manager is going to struggle to replicate the form an existing manager had, especially with an unfamiliar squad.
Cate - I said mid-table, NOT relegation.
So why was it only Hull that came in for him?
Who would you rank higher in the Championship?
Under Pearson we could have gone up next season. Without him, we won't.
Why do people keep ignoring the role Wayne Brown played in the first leg defeat!
So why was it only Hull that came in for him?
Because they were the only club looking for a manager?
I bet there are a few clubs who have managers hanging by a thread.
Ha ha ha Lee Hoos just said to stringy he had a better relationship with him than he did.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |