homer
Well-Known Member
Because the rebound is from an opposition player who is now playing him onside. If it came back off the post I agree he is still offside.
No, that's not the Law
He's offsde
Because the rebound is from an opposition player who is now playing him onside. If it came back off the post I agree he is still offside.
Because the rebound is from an opposition player who is now playing him onside. If it came back off the post I agree he is still offside.
Looks like we have seen the last of King, Ulloa, Musa and Slimani.
But he was out wide so was not interfering with play?
Can you all stop moaning about the offside rule? Seriously, it's embarrassing.
New lad looks superb, remains to be seen why on earth he was playing in Ligue 2 and cost peanuts,
Even after you saw him play?Was it peanuts? They said £4.5 million (I think) on BTSport. I thought it was nearer 2?? Given he'd previously been traded on frees/crisp packets, I thought even that was a lot!
Pbro must have been really shit.
Nobody's moaning - we're helping a fellow fan understand the laws of the game
It's what a football forum is for
I'd add Benny to that list. I was very surprised not to see Huth come on, just for a run. Maybe he's not yet completely ready. I've liked Benny in the past, he can sometimes looked composed on the ball, but I don't see a place for him with us now.
Does this mean he's going to disappear into obscurity?A Joe Waters like debut for Diabaté
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |