LeeCovFox
Well-Known Member
It seems obvious to me that King being picked over James was a big factor in our defeat on Saturday. Not because King is a poor player but because he isn't suited to a scrap in the same way that James is.
Many of us went into the Christmas period concerned that we'd pay for our poor away form and that we'd lose ground following the matches at Hull and Burnley. James was selected for those games and we came away with four points without conceding a goal. Those who attended reported being pleasantly surprised by our ability in those games to keep it tight and James was singled out for praise by many. We went on to win our next away game, at Bristol City, without conceding.
I was more worried about the selection of King over James on Saturday than I was about anything happening up front.
I'm quite surprised to hear people say that King's selection was merited based on his performance against Wolves. I can't say I thought he was particularly good and even if he was it would only have been in comparison to his team mates. We were terrible against Wolves and lucky to get any kind of result. We were overpowered and outplayed in midfield and I thought we missed James badly. It's okay saying 'we shouldn't change a winning team' but when the winning team plays as badly as it did against Wolves it's quite obvious that something needs changing. We won that match in spite of our set up, not because of it.
Many of us went into the Christmas period concerned that we'd pay for our poor away form and that we'd lose ground following the matches at Hull and Burnley. James was selected for those games and we came away with four points without conceding a goal. Those who attended reported being pleasantly surprised by our ability in those games to keep it tight and James was singled out for praise by many. We went on to win our next away game, at Bristol City, without conceding.
I was more worried about the selection of King over James on Saturday than I was about anything happening up front.
I'm quite surprised to hear people say that King's selection was merited based on his performance against Wolves. I can't say I thought he was particularly good and even if he was it would only have been in comparison to his team mates. We were terrible against Wolves and lucky to get any kind of result. We were overpowered and outplayed in midfield and I thought we missed James badly. It's okay saying 'we shouldn't change a winning team' but when the winning team plays as badly as it did against Wolves it's quite obvious that something needs changing. We won that match in spite of our set up, not because of it.
Last edited: