Season Ticket Update

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Southern Fox said:
We are taking risks on older players and players that have something to prove (gillespie :shock: ). Under MON, Lenny, Muz, Gups, Sav were all nutured (sp.) into the LCFC way which we dont have anymore.
I was excited about the signing of Canero, as IMO he was a player like MON would have taken a punt. More of the like to follow. Please!!!!!!!!!

Spot on, I could not agree more. In today's market players like Muzzy and others would not cost the same as they did back then and these players do exist not only in the Fizzy leagues, but in other countries as well.
 
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.
 
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

second div players are like a box of chocolates... you never know what ya gonna get. Where as with hayles i think you do.

Personally i want a younger player to, you have ya two old heads in dublin and hayles so a up and cummer would be good to go with them.

Dublin 34
Hayles 32

Ferdinand 38
Dickov 31

Micky has lowerd the combined age of our strickers by 3 years!!!! He's done what he said he would do!!!!! :roll: :wink:
 
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.
 
Babylon said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

second div players are like a box of chocolates... you never know what ya gonna get. Where as with hayles i think you do.

Personally i want a younger player to, you have ya two old heads in dublin and hayles so a up and cummer would be good to go with them.

Dublin 34
Hayles 32

Ferdinand 38
Dickov 31

Micky has lowerd the combined age of our strickers by 3 years!!!! He's done what he said he would do!!!!! :roll: :wink:

One of the main things about re-building is doing things differently, I know unknown players are a gamble, but so are signing these so called experienced players who clearly aren't wanted by their previous clubs which doesn't bode well. It showed last season that signing aload of experienced players was as much of a gamble as signing some unproven young players. Canero looks alot better prospect than Curtis, Hignett or Howey looked for us! Get some zero's in and turn them in to hero's like O'Neill did, you always need some experience but don't over shag it.
 
Malf said:
Babylon said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

second div players are like a box of chocolates... you never know what ya gonna get. Where as with hayles i think you do.

Personally i want a younger player to, you have ya two old heads in dublin and hayles so a up and cummer would be good to go with them.

Dublin 34
Hayles 32

Ferdinand 38
Dickov 31

Micky has lowerd the combined age of our strickers by 3 years!!!! He's done what he said he would do!!!!! :roll: :wink:

One of the main things about re-building is doing things differently, I know unknown players are a gamble, but so are signing these so called experienced players who clearly aren't wanted by their previous clubs which doesn't bode well. It showed last season that signing aload of experienced players was as much of a gamble as signing some unproven young players. Canero looks alot better prospect than Curtis, Hignett or Howey looked for us! Get some zero's in and turn them in to hero's like O'Neill did, you always need some experience but don't over shag it.

Chuck in a few oldies, add a few youngster, a pich of micky adams bang it in the oven and get a lovely fluffy sponge cake. BANG! PREMIER HERE WE COME!!!
 
FNQ said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.

What was the point in that post if you're not going to explain why Malf is wrong? :roll:
 
webmaster said:
lazzer said:
Joe_Fox said:
lazzer said:
ive met him at the five a side and he's a big old unit thats why im surprised i havent seen him

Lazzer, that is very flattering!

well he is so am i come to think of it :roll:

I'm not arguing with Lazzer's description of me!

But I've lost 17 pounds since I started my diet, so if I can keep that up I'll only be a fat bastard for another 6 months or so. Then I'll just be an old unit.

ive lost six webby so we wont recognise each other when we meet again
 
Scowcroft said:
FNQ said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.

What was the point in that post if you're not going to explain why Malf is wrong? :roll:

Because he's an absolute cock hole, he often disagrees with people with a one word answer like that. The thing that is shocking is the fact that what I said is probably true. Have a word with yourself twat.
 
Malf said:
Scowcroft said:
FNQ said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.

What was the point in that post if you're not going to explain why Malf is wrong? :roll:

Because he's an absolute cock hole, he often disagrees with people with a one word answer like that. The thing that is shocking is the fact that what I said is probably true. Have a word with yourself twat.

Wrong :wink:
 
Joe_Fox said:
Malf said:
Scowcroft said:
FNQ said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.

What was the point in that post if you're not going to explain why Malf is wrong? :roll:

Because he's an absolute cock hole, he often disagrees with people with a one word answer like that. The thing that is shocking is the fact that what I said is probably true. Have a word with yourself twat.

Wrong :wink:

Agreed! :?
 
Joe_Fox said:
Malf said:
Scowcroft said:
FNQ said:
Malf said:
If you take in to consideration the wages a player from the lower leagues would be on compared to a player who's been plying his trade in the premiership for many years and is past his best you will find that the old hacker will be on about £100-200,000 more each year than the lower league player and that's being lenient. Now in the current transfer market a hot prospect from division two or three or players from scotland will only fetch around £250,000 and that possibly won't be paid upfront so you may have a few add ons that you pay a year or so down the line, but what i'm saying is on the whole scale of things getting some young potential in who are desperate to progress won't cost anymore than someone like Barry Hayles or Dougie Freedman would.

Wrong.

What was the point in that post if you're not going to explain why Malf is wrong? :roll:

Because he's an absolute cock hole, he often disagrees with people with a one word answer like that. The thing that is shocking is the fact that what I said is probably true. Have a word with yourself twat.

Wrong :wink:

:lol: :lol: I think he was trying to say wonger, as in money. He just spelt it wrong.
 
Back to the original topic, the OS states today that season ticket sales are now at 13,100 which is alot better than I thought they would be. Attendances may not be that bad next season, a few exciting signings and the seson tickets may break 15,000. 8)
 
Naughty Fox said:
Back to the original topic, the OS states today that season ticket sales are now at 13,100 which is alot better than I thought they would be. Attendances may not be that bad next season, a few exciting signings and the seson tickets may break 15,000. 8)

I actually think we'll beat 15k and get nearer 17k. There will be alot of singings made in the next week or so, and that will accelerate sales even further.
 
Scowcroft said:
Naughty Fox said:
Back to the original topic, the OS states today that season ticket sales are now at 13,100 which is alot better than I thought they would be. Attendances may not be that bad next season, a few exciting signings and the seson tickets may break 15,000. 8)

I actually think we'll beat 15k and get nearer 17k. There will be alot of singings made in the next week or so, and that will accelerate sales even further.

It's all good news. I still believe Euro 2004 is helping sales rise. I think we'll sell about 18000 season tickets before the start of the season.
 
Joe_Fox said:
Scowcroft said:
Naughty Fox said:
Back to the original topic, the OS states today that season ticket sales are now at 13,100 which is alot better than I thought they would be. Attendances may not be that bad next season, a few exciting signings and the seson tickets may break 15,000. 8)

I actually think we'll beat 15k and get nearer 17k. There will be alot of singings made in the next week or so, and that will accelerate sales even further.

It's all good news. I still believe Euro 2004 is helping sales rise. I think we'll sell about 18000 season tickets before the start of the season.

Fandabidozi... i'm a little scotch girl just call me jimmy crankie.

That's excellantaaaaaaaaaaaaa if we get that many!!!! Och I.
 
Babylon said:
Joe_Fox said:
Scowcroft said:
Naughty Fox said:
Back to the original topic, the OS states today that season ticket sales are now at 13,100 which is alot better than I thought they would be. Attendances may not be that bad next season, a few exciting signings and the seson tickets may break 15,000. 8)

I actually think we'll beat 15k and get nearer 17k. There will be alot of singings made in the next week or so, and that will accelerate sales even further.

It's all good news. I still believe Euro 2004 is helping sales rise. I think we'll sell about 18000 season tickets before the start of the season.

Fandabidozi... i'm a little scotch girl just call me jimmy crankie.

That's excellantaaaaaaaaaaaaa if we get that many!!!! Och I.

Och I balls? Tell me about it mate, it's always the worst after a night on the piss
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1536
2Chelsea1634
3Arsenal1733
4Nottm F1731
5Aston Villa1728
6Manchester C  1727
7Newcastle1726
8Bournemouth1625
9Brighton1725
10Fulham1624
11Tottenham 1623
12Brentford1723
13Manchester U1622
14West Ham1720
15Palace1716
16Everton1515
17Leicester1614
18Ipswich1712
19Wolves169
20Southampton165
Back
Top