Spion Kop Returns

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
We did play Sheff Weds on New Year's Eve. Thommo hit the post with a peno, and netted the rebound. Numpty. :icon_roll

It also snowed, and a load of fat blokes took their shirts off. Not pretty.


The Thompson rebounded penalty was against Liverpool was it not?
 
He was best mates with the steward I reported it to before, now he's likely to be a hero to all Spion Kop/N Block mongies I very much doubt anything would get done.
Grow up and stop generalisng everything you don't like as something the "mongies" would worship.
 
The Thompson rebounded penalty was against Liverpool was it not?

He knows all these useless facts you know.

I bet Boc is sulking in a corner now he knows PDS is a real life walking "Of Fossils and Foxes" know all...........:081:
 
Here just for you swede is another earlier photo of the view of the Spion Kop from the opposite end

Must have been the beginning of the season from the state of the pitch and a big match - the corner of the double decker looks more or less full and the popular side (aka East Stand) similar.
 
Must have been the beginning of the season from the state of the pitch and a big match - the corner of the double decker looks more or less full and the popular side (aka East Stand) similar.

It was against Notts County when the "New" Main Stand was being finalised as can be seen from this photo
 

Attachments

  • City vs Notts County.jpg
    City vs Notts County.jpg
    95.1 KB · Views: 85
They may have renamed it, but according to some of the stewards I spoke to, the fact that they still had blocks (e.g. F) and that the numbers were screwed up (Spion Kop 20-30 is F 180-200 or summit like that and F20-30 is SK180-200)

If you are going to rebrand something makesure for its launch it is correct.
 
If you are going to rebrand something makesure for its launch it is correct.
Maybe it is correct for the purposes.

Are you sure you're not confusing "rebranding" with copying?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2253
2Arsenal2347
3Nottm F2344
4Manchester C  2341
5Newcastle2341
6Chelsea2340
7Bournemouth2340
8Aston Villa2337
9Brighton2334
10Fulham2333
11Brentford2331
12Manchester U2329
13Palace2327
14West Ham2327
15Tottenham 2324
16Everton2223
17Leicester2317
18Wolves2316
19Ipswich2316
20Southampton236
Back
Top