If he was sacked for footballing reasons then surely Peasan's position is untenable.Sacked, according to the Daily Mail.
If he was sacked for footballing reasons then surely Peasan's position is untenable.
I think the last sentence of the article answers that question.
Nice of you to come on the forum Terry. Must have been a difficult afternoon for you.
Indeed.
It's virtually a carbon copy of what happened here. Moody went in October, Malky went day after boxing day.I think the last sentence of the article answers that question.
Moody and Malky were best mates. I doubt you can say that about NP and Mr.Robinson.It's virtually a carbon copy of what happened here. Moody went in October, Malky went day after boxing day.
NP won't be given a chance to waste more money in the window.
There's nothing personal about any of it. It's just business.Moody and Malky were best mates. I doubt you can say that about NP and Mr.Robinson.
Interesting. Clearly the club hold him part-responsible for our terrible form of late by him not signing enough quality in the summer...
I imagine if we were top of the league, VT would have given Malky a reach around.But wasn't Malky's relationship with Tan under strain for a long time prior to him going?
Terry ROBINson .......
For me there's 3 possibilities....Looking from the outside and not knowing who was really responsible for the summer signings that does appear to be the case.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |