londonfox
Well-Known Member
I gave up after the headline. That whole website looks like complete and utter bollocks.
Speculation The hysterically annoying, and totally unfounded, but traditional, January 2024 rumours thread.
- Thread starter ThaiSweetChilli
- Start date
fox58
Well-Known Member
I thought that was the Scandinavian supporters website, so not in their first language may account for that
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
It is one of the Scandinavian supporters website, and as you say, not his first language.
Fair enough - and I don't speak IKEA, so I told the wife not to order any more flatpack furnishings
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Word of a Vestergaard contract renewal in the works.
londonfox
Well-Known Member
Good news
popillius
Well-Known Member
BN will be furious.
Lako42
Well-Known Member
For PL strikers
SilverFox
Well-Known Member
A partridge in a pear tree?
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
I saw those reports and have decided to ignore them. We cannot possibly be so stupid as to repeat the exact same mistakes that got us into this mess all over again.
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Other than his obvious lack of pace. If he is played in the correct position and with the correct players around him, why would we not discuss a contract renewal for him?
He has been a revelation this season (along with all the other so called differs) who were mismanaged over the previous two seasons.
What does he lack (bar pace) that we need from a player in his position?
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
It's difficult to know where to start. In summary, if you played someone like Vestergaard in the PL, you have to play far too deep and we'd be ripped to shreds.
We started this season trying to play a higher line and Vestergaard got caught out regularly. That's why he picked up so many bookings in his first appearances this season. We have since dropped quite a bit which protects him. You can do it in the Championship because the level of opposition is shite. In the PL, we'd concede so many goals it's terrifying.
We will need more defensive pace next season to play a higher line and I can't see any of Vestergaard, Faes, Souttar or Coady being capable of it. It's why I'm so keen to see us play the likes of Nelson and Doyle as much as possible from here on in. We need to know if they could do a job next year or not.
None of that is personal about Vestergaard. However, I do have an issue with him too. I don't forget how he got when the going got tough over the previous couple of years. He'll also be 32 at the start of next season and he'll demand a lot more money than he's worth.
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Fair enough. I guess it partially depends on how much he would cost.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
So I’m guessing we do the following:
Attempt to secure Wilf, Vestergaard and Vardy.
Allow Nacho, Praet, Albrighton to walk.
Sign Fatawu. Not Yunus or Doyle.
Attempt to secure Wilf, Vestergaard and Vardy.
Allow Nacho, Praet, Albrighton to walk.
Sign Fatawu. Not Yunus or Doyle.
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
I think that’s about right, perhaps with the caveat of keeping/signing Albrighton and Yunus?
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
| 5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
| 7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
| 13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
| 15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
| 16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
| 18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |
