The official, though undoubtedly misunderstood or derided, 24/25 VAR thread

[Miles Away]

I’m sorry but several people in the match thread were adamant that every angle was clearly onside.

It's possible I was mistaken.

 

[SilverFox]

I BN is correct in the post match thread that this was the image they used (albeit cropped here) to determine the call, there is no way Mateta was onside.

View attachment 18976

I hope sincerely a decision wasn’t based on this obscure angled photograph with subjective line.

How in the actual **** can anyone say this random disposable camera picture casts sufficient doubt on the on field decision to the extent where it was right to conclude the decision should be changed.

Someone from the premier league should be made to say with a straight face that they aren’t just trying to **** us over.

 

[DillyDing22]

Why did they take Mateta’s position from his knee?
Looks like his head is further forward,
Most people run with their head further forward, not like Forrest Gump!

 

[H T B]

What percentage of 8 billion is your dozen or so?

 

[popillius]

What percentage of 8 billion is your dozen or so?

****ing WHOOSHY flaptastic.

 

[Mike - True Blue Tinter]

If the whole point of the VAR is too make accurate decisions on offside, but then admit they cannot get accurate camera angles at this ground, they should have gone with the on field decision and just stick to penalty and red card decisions.

 

[H T B]

****ing WHOOSHY flaptastic.

Hmmm

 

[Fox Fan]