Verma Pens Permanent Deal

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only a small mistake granted but surely you'd only have to proof read it to pick something like that up.

It's supposed to be proof read by two people - the journalist and a sub-editor. It still amazes me how many mistakes get through when the copy is checked by two people.
 
If Pearson goes out and spends gob loads of cash on someone I don't rate, I'll be the first to question it. Should he, for example, give a 3 year, 30,000 a week contract to a 35 year old c**t (ring any bells), I'll probably go spare.

I'm not giving Pearson a free pass, but I'll say this, he's given me very little reason to question his judgment in players thus far, so if he wants to throw a couple of quid at a local product/project, fine with me.

In this instance, he's given a piddling one year contract to a player none of us have seen play. It's a speculative punt, but a very low risk one. To pick fault with this signing, in particular, seems somewhat negative and pointless.
 
If Pearson goes out and spends gob loads of cash on someone I don't rate, I'll be the first to question it. Should he, for example, give a 3 year, 30,000 a week contract to a 35 year old c**t (ring any bells), I'll probably go spare.

I'm not giving Pearson a free pass, but I'll say this, he's given me very little reason to question his judgment in players thus far, so if he wants to throw a couple of quid at a local product/project, fine with me.

In this instance, he's given a piddling one year contract to a player none of us have seen play. It's a speculative punt, but a very low risk one. To pick fault with this signing, in particular, seems somewhat negative and pointless.

Yea but I heard he's Asian.
 
It's supposed to be proof read by two people - the journalist and a sub-editor. It still amazes me how many mistakes get through when the copy is checked by two people.

They obviously weren't in top set English.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top