Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Some people have proved themselves incapable of having a serious conversation. This sort of response only encourages their activities :icon_wink
Waghorn over Fryatt any day
- Thread starter lestatillidie
- Start date
- Status
Some people have proved themselves incapable of having a serious conversation. This sort of response only encourages their activities :icon_wink
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Sorry, I suppose I should've said: Lol Waghorn is ghey, Fryatt scores more than yer mam working in a brothel.
Last edited:
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Now....Waghorn over Gallagher...I think you could make that argument.
David Gwilliam
Well-Known Member
The idea that Waghorn should start is not in itself silly. A lot of the criticism is aimed at the idea that he should replace Fryatt who I feel has been (along with Wellens) our best player this season.
I can only judge Waghorn from what little I have seen of him in home games so some posters will know better than me. Is he versatile enough to play instead of Gallagher?
I would always pick Steve Howard to partner Matty Fryatt if he is fit. However, I am not sure that playing in the most physically demanding position at 33 Howard can play two 90 minutes in quick succession. Would Waghorn be a better partner for Fryatt than Yann? I have seen even less of Yann. Can the fans who travel away tell me.
Apart from age Howard's current problem is that he is desperate to score and sesperation clogs on muscle memory. When Steve Howard came off against Preston he seemed to be furious with himselfI would guess that one goal lucky or not will solve that.
Anyway in a week in which DJ has returned to favour it is nice to see LestatillIdie posting again. Football and forums thrive on controversy.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
This forum thrives on one thing, and one thing alone...And I think we know what that is....
Tits.
That said, if we are going to go 3 up front, I think Waghorn has perhaps done enough to warrant that 3rd spot along with Fryatt and Howard.
Tits.
That said, if we are going to go 3 up front, I think Waghorn has perhaps done enough to warrant that 3rd spot along with Fryatt and Howard.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Tits are brilliant. I think we should have a thread all about knockers.
From Gradel to Grave
Active Member
Metal Macky
Cate Fox
Well-Known Member
Check the General Chat section :icon_lol:
Last edited:
Brauny Blue
Active Member
Portugeezer
New Member
Before we nail leicestertillidie to the cross and scream Valhalla! I'd be surprised if those people who have been to the last three games would disagree that Fryatt hasn't played all that well in those game.
I'm far from being a 'Fryatt Hater' but don't think he's worked as hard as he usally does and has certainly missed Howard alongside him.
Maybe a game on the bench wouldn't harm him, but rejuvinate him?
I'm far from being a 'Fryatt Hater' but don't think he's worked as hard as he usally does and has certainly missed Howard alongside him.
Maybe a game on the bench wouldn't harm him, but rejuvinate him?
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Before we nail leicestertillidie to the cross and scream Valhalla! I'd be surprised if those people who have been to the last three games would disagree that Fryatt hasn't played all that well in those game.
I'm far from being a 'Fryatt Hater' but don't think he's worked as hard as he usally does and has certainly missed Howard alongside him.
Maybe a game on the bench wouldn't harm him, but rejuvinate him?
Really? Didn't go to Boro and agree he had an off day vs Cov, but thought he was MOTM vs Preston, our only player who looked like creating anything the whole game.
Portugeezer
New Member
Yep, agree PF, looked good on the ball against Preston, just didn't think the work rate was there.
Maybe, because the whole team had an off day?
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Well, I respectfully disagree, thought he was the only player who looked bothered that game. Personally, I think it would be sucicide to drop Fryatt.
Portugeezer
New Member
To be fair mate, who am I to disagree with Pearson? Took 4 points from a difficult 6 so I'm happy as long as we're picking up points...
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Agreed. We can debate all we like, but NP is doing an incredible job right now, and I'll trust him in his judgement.
Hector
Well-Known Member
:icon_eek:
Sheen Fox
Member
This is a foxes debating forum and at least its a proper football question.
The key point is that the only reason we are even able to debate this is because for the first time in years, we have a bench that actually deserve a starting place.
A proper squad fighting for the shirt. For us that is revolutionary.
Thank you, Nigel.
I don't agree with it, but the fact it's even being asked
The key point is that the only reason we are even able to debate this is because for the first time in years, we have a bench that actually deserve a starting place.
A proper squad fighting for the shirt. For us that is revolutionary.
Thank you, Nigel.
I don't agree with it, but the fact it's even being asked
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Yes, but who is the question being asked by is the important point.
Quite frankly, he makes most blue mongies look like Cov fans. :icon_wink
Last edited:
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
| 5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
| 7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
| 13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
| 15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
| 16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
| 18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |
