londonfox
Well-Known Member
I'd like to see the Premier League table without Brendan Rodgers.
I'd like to see the Premier League table without Brendan Rodgers.
How is that related to BN's chart (VAR) or Jeff's table (date-based)?...****ing xG nonsense being shown for what it is. Again.
It's not. It's related to the xG nonsense.How is that related to BN's chart (VAR) or Jeff's table (date-based)?...
Gives me PTSD from this sort of stuff when we missed out on the top 4 twice.
This is one of the advantages of getting old. Not a cat in hells chance of reading this, let alone understanding it! It looks like one of those charts I used to get from the financial analysts which usually turned out to prove what we already knew
It says the Leicester will go up, Wednesday will go down, and that most of the other clubs could finish anywhere fifth and twentieth. So yes, this is another proof of what we already knowThis is one of the advantages of getting old. Not a cat in hells chance of reading this, let alone understanding it! It looks like one of those charts I used to get from the financial analysts which usually turned out to prove what we already knew
It shows quite clearly the Xc in the league. Full of ****s.It says the Leicester will go up, Wednesday will go down, and that most of the other clubs could finish anywhere fifth and twentieth. So yes, this is another proof of what we already know
If that **** was still in charge, i think we’d be closer to the bottom end of the chart, so don’t worry your pretty [!!!!] little head.Gives me PTSD from this sort of stuff when we missed out on the top 4 twice.
Not only that Wednesday will go down, but also Rotherham and possibly Huddersfield. After the way Yorkshire has treated us this year, this has got to be a good thing and I am delighted.It says the Leicester will go up, Wednesday will go down, and that most of the other clubs could finish anywhere fifth and twentieth. So yes, this is another proof of what we already know
I know, but if I've read the chart correctly, we are estimated to have a 96.3% of being in the top two automatic promotion places, therefore, safe to assume Opta must have ruled out a BR return to City before the end of the season.Gives me PTSD from this sort of stuff when we missed out on the top 4 twice.
Maybe, but that’s kind of a general flaw of theory of probability?I always take this sort of stuff with a pinch of salt. This completely disregards form dips, injuries etc. Plus, there's almost always a push from an unexpected side outside of the top 8!!!
No, the theory is fine. The flaw is with people who seek to draw hard conclusions without understanding the theory.Maybe, but that’s kind of a general flaw of theory of probability?
Everything with a pinch of salt. So many different variables play their part. Luckily this ones in our favour. Now we gotta stay injury-free, on form as much as possible, not lose anyone critical (Ndidi) in Jan and hope that Leeds/Soton stutter.No, the theory is fine. The flaw is with people who seek to draw hard conclusions without understanding the theory.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Manchester C | 9 | 23 |
2 | Liverpool | 9 | 22 |
3 | Arsenal | 10 | 18 |
4 | Aston Villa | 9 | 18 |
5 | Chelsea | 9 | 17 |
6 | Brighton | 9 | 16 |
7 | Nottm F | 9 | 16 |
8 | Newcastle | 10 | 15 |
9 | Tottenham | 9 | 13 |
10 | Brentford | 9 | 13 |
11 | Fulham | 9 | 12 |
12 | Bournemouth | 9 | 12 |
13 | West Ham | 9 | 11 |
14 | Manchester U | 9 | 11 |
15 | Leicester | 9 | 9 |
16 | Everton | 9 | 9 |
17 | Palace | 9 | 6 |
18 | Ipswich | 9 | 4 |
19 | Wolves | 9 | 2 |
20 | Southampton | 9 | 1 |