( it must be advantageous to have newbies onboard for the start of pre-season training (something we never do!)
Derby have just signed Croft from Norwich on a free, that is a quality bit of business for them and the type of player we could do with tbh.
Do we need a team of beautiful people?
Two years ago we had six new signings by the time training started, and another three a few days later. Most of them were rubbish.
Do we need a team of beautiful people?
We dont necessarily need to spend big but we do need quality at centre midfield and striker back-up.
For the last few years the official team photo has absent players(ie signed afterwards), looks like same again this year ( it must be advantageous to have newbies onboard for the start of pre-season training (something we never do!)
These signings are taking the piss now........
What?
No, just not plug-ugly ( unless it's a centre-half, when it's expected ).
Wayne Brown? :icon_bigg
What?
I was saying that the "big" signing are taking a very long time and they were taking the piss.
And what would you class as a 'big signing'
They are not taking a long time and I fail to see how something that has not/ might not occur can 'take the piss'
And what would you class as a 'big signing'
Erm a signing where we have to sign a decent sum of money or a player from a decent premier league team.
Jack (not Jacko) Hobbs?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |