( it must be advantageous to have newbies onboard for the start of pre-season training (something we never do!)
Derby have just signed Croft from Norwich on a free, that is a quality bit of business for them and the type of player we could do with tbh.
Do we need a team of beautiful people?
Two years ago we had six new signings by the time training started, and another three a few days later. Most of them were rubbish.
Do we need a team of beautiful people?
We dont necessarily need to spend big but we do need quality at centre midfield and striker back-up.
For the last few years the official team photo has absent players(ie signed afterwards), looks like same again this year ( it must be advantageous to have newbies onboard for the start of pre-season training (something we never do!)
These signings are taking the piss now........
What?
No, just not plug-ugly ( unless it's a centre-half, when it's expected ).
Wayne Brown? :icon_bigg
What?
I was saying that the "big" signing are taking a very long time and they were taking the piss.
They are not taking a long time and I fail to see how something that has not/ might not occur can 'take the piss'
And what would you class as a 'big signing'
Erm a signing where we have to sign a decent sum of money or a player from a decent premier league team.
Jack (not Jacko) Hobbs?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Blackburn | 0 | 0 |
2 | Bristol City | 0 | 0 |
3 | Burnley | 0 | 0 |
4 | Cardiff City | 0 | 0 |
5 | Coventry City | 0 | 0 |
6 | Derby | 0 | 0 |
7 | Hull City | 0 | 0 |
8 | Leeds Utd | 0 | 0 |
9 | Luton Town | 0 | 0 |
10 | Middlesbro | 0 | 0 |
11 | Millwall | 0 | 0 |
12 | Norwich City | 0 | 0 |
13 | Oxford Utd | 0 | 0 |
14 | Plymouth | 0 | 0 |
15 | Portsmouth | 0 | 0 |
16 | Preston | 0 | 0 |
17 | QPR | 0 | 0 |
18 | Sheffield W | 0 | 0 |
19 | Stoke City | 0 | 0 |
20 | Sunderland | 0 | 0 |
21 | Swansea City | 0 | 0 |
22 | Watford | 0 | 0 |
23 | West Brom | 0 | 0 |
24 | Sheffield Utd | 0 | -2 |