Speculation Who's next?

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pellegrini right out of left field...Ranieri right out of left field...what are the odds on us winning the PL next season please?
 
I actually don't care who it is as long as it somebody given the support of the owners to come in and give the little darlings the biggest kick up the arse. The club stinks of complacency, with too many living off past glory and believing they are untouchable and possibly bigger than the club itself. We need a massive shake up and clear out from top to bottom, starting with Rudkin and a good few players.
 
PS would love to see Cambiasso involved in the new backroom set up in some coaching capacity or Assistant Manager role
 
I wish media bods would stop suggesting names that nobody here has mentioned. It makes me think that one or the other are talking shit.

Of course, the club will appoint someone that neither have mentioned leading me to believe all 3 parties are suspect.

What role chance eh? Just who is available, wants it and will work? That's got to narrow the candidates significantly.
 
Seems like more managers have ruled themselves out.

Big Sam
Sean Dyche
Roberto Mancini
Carlo Ancelotti
Dave Wagner

P.s these are articles I have read and not checked their ketchup...not have I checked the spelling
 
Watford are fantastic to watch. Just like us a couple of years back.

Silva is doing a wonderful job there. It's a brilliantly run club that change managers practically every year and get better for it.

The pundits slagging us off are very quiet about that of course.
 
Brown Nose said:
Watford are fantastic to watch. Just like us a couple of years back.

Silva is doing a wonderful job there. It's a brilliantly run club that change managers practically every year and get better for it.

The pundits slagging us off are very quiet about that of course.
Click to expand...
Probably because it is the exception rather than the rule. Burnley are proving that giving a manager time to build a squad and an identity even after a perceived 'failure' can be a sensible and fruitful thing to do.
 
popillius said:
Probably because it is the exception rather than the rule. Burnley are proving that giving a manager time to build a squad and an identity even after a perceived 'failure' can be a sensible and fruitful thing to do.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Weird how Silva seems to be doing quite well for Watford right now yet couldn't really get it going at Hull.. Still it's early days there.

Someone like Pellegrini would be a better short term appointment for us. I think Dyche would be a bit like Pearson, someone you take on to build something over the longer term but may be a bit more risky in the shorter term. Shakespeare IMO would have been like Clough at Derby, sticking with a shit manager when it's painfully obvious he's not up to the standard because everyone is telling you how important stability and 'time to build' is. We did the right thing getting rid early, the stupid bit was taking him on permanent in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top