Why are so many posters assuming Beckford is the angel in this scenario?
Can i ask why you would assume otherwise? Why would people assume he has done something wrong without knowing?
Can i ask why you would assume otherwise?
Why would people assume he has done something wrong without knowing?
Cate doesn't appear to be making any assumptions to me
Indeed. Likewise, why anybody assume that PEAR SON has done anything wrong without knowing?
I havnt assumed Pear §on has done anything wrong, i know it. Unless the club wants to tell us the player has done something wrong then i can only assume that he hasn't, which makes the transfer a total and utter shambles.
If the club wants to enlighten us as to any other reason for the transfer then so be it, but without any hint of an issue with beckford I can only take it that Pear Son is an idiot who thinks Waghorn is better than Beckford.
I havnt assumed Pear §on has done anything wrong, i know it. Unless the club wants to tell us the player has done something wrong then i can only assume that he hasn't, which makes the transfer a total and utter shambles.
If the club wants to enlighten us as to any other reason for the transfer then so be it, but without any hint of an issue with beckford I can only take it that Pear Son is an idiot who thinks Waghorn is better than Beckford.
Can we all leave this alone now until the end of December? Nobody on here has a clue what has happened at the club, who said what, who did or didn't take a shit on the sofa etc
This is the new DJ Campbell thread - expect it to end May 2013.
Pearson has done exactly that in his post match.
I am disapointed that Pearson keeps falling out with players. I don't doubt that the players in question have done something to displease him, but from what we hear, his treatment of them after is very disrespectful, and is only likely to have one outcome.
Making established senior proffesionals such as Mills and Beckford train with kids is insulting to them, and is only ever going to make the problem worse, and i think rather childish on Pearsons part.
No, he hasn't. He said Beckford wanted to leave so he let him go. That isn't a reason in itself; it's a consequence of the reason. Now, personally I don't care all that much about this loan move in particular. But it's embarrassing watching people fall over themselves to swallow whatever the club and its representatives (of which Pearson is one) tell us is the truth. It's perfectly healthy to question them.
Maybe just maybe. It's as simple as Pearson doesn't rate him (cos hes not that good as everyone says) and Beckford wants to play games.
No, he hasn't. He said Beckford wanted to leave so he let him go. That isn't a reason in itself; it's a consequence of the reason. Now, personally I don't care all that much about this loan move in particular. But it's embarrassing watching people fall over themselves to swallow whatever the club and its representatives (of which Pearson is one) tell us is the truth. It's perfectly healthy to question them.
If the club wants to enlighten us as to any
other reason for the transfer then so be
it
I will get slated for saying it but I would much sooner have Nuge, Vardy or Waggy in the side.
Of course it's a reason. You said
but then when they do, you say people are just swallowing what they are told. It must be very interesting on your planet.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
10 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
11 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
12 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
13 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
14 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
15 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
18 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |