I would prefer it to be a loan to be honest.
'Wood' and 'Wolves' not capitalised in the headline. Nice.http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/wolves-close-deal-wood/story-22520313-detail/story.html?
Close to agreeing a deal believed to be 1.25M
he's a better goal scorer than other options ahead of him
http://www.teamtalk.com/derby-county/9419155/-? Norwich, Fulham & Derby now said to be interested
Geoff Peters has just tweeted this:
"Wolves boss Kenny Jackett has just told me that a deal for Chris Wood from Leicester looks dead and unlikely to be resurrected"
Maybe NP was sat on his sofa on Sunday watching some lower league losers, when an interviewer put a microphone under KJs chin and started getting him to talk about signing someone else's player. And KJ talked a little too much for NPs liking and got a sharp phone call shortly afterwards.
Just wondering why we're contemplating selling wood rather than loaning him out? Do we need the money? Just seems a bit odd, given we haven't spent much thus far?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |