16 months.We gave Puel 18 months
16 months.We gave Puel 18 months
We gave Puel 18 months which is fair I believe?
We have an exceptional squad in my opinion - they were just being mis managed.
So long as ther new manager advocates youth and wants us to play at pace then I don’t really mind who we get.
In my opinion the current players are very flexible and just need a little guidance.
FFS,whoever it is - please play to our strengths!
Get ready for Big Sam.....
16 months.
Puel Out thread started on March 3rd 2018.
He was only appointed manager on 25th October 2017.
Barely 4 months in the job for ****s sake!!
Recent results were pretty poor but a lot of our fans need to seriously look at themselves too.
If we as fans can't even support a new manager for 6 months then we are royally ****ed as a football club.
If you want to be like that then go an support Chelsea.
Puel Out thread started on March 3rd 2018.
He was only appointed manager on 25th October 2017.
Barely 4 months in the job for ****s sake!!
Recent results were pretty poor but a lot of our fans need to seriously look at themselves too.
If we as fans can't even support a new manager for 6 months then we are royally ****ed as a football club.
If you want to be like that then go an support Chelsea.
Managers get paid extortionately for what they do. Do you think Puel came here thinking he'd be here for years? Not a chance. He rents a student flat for fecks sake.
He's a jobbing manager that will go wherever the money is. He's got a few million for 16 months work. He'll probably be thrilled to be sloping back to Monaco with a bag full of cash.
Managers have also dumped us for better prospects when they get the chance. Not recently, because most of our appointments have been terrible, but there was a time in the not too distant past when we lost three managers in a row who wanted to 'better themselves'.
I will never feel sorry for any manager. The brief is to win games. It's not rocket science. If it's obvious that they're not up to the job in one match, it's enough for me. Let alone six months.
Puel didn't win enough games. Neither did Shakespeare. Neither did Ranieri in 16/17. That's all that matters.
GerriminI'm free...
What if it’s obvious the approach being adopted by a manager isn’t one you’re ever going to be able to support? You’d, at the very least, be having a word in any other industry.
It was obvious close to a year a go that we were heading in the direction of the location we’ve found ourselves in. Namely every game against sides outside of the top six following this pattern:
- Piss about with the ball playing easy passes until getting to within thirty yards of goal.
- Realise you’ve moved up the pitch so *ing slowly that the opposition is set so pass side to side for a bit in the hope that they all * off and let you score.
- They don’t all **** off and let you score so you either a) take a shot from distance (note: Puel fans will tell you that this = ‘a chance’. Or b) pass the ball backwards, sometimes all the way back to the keeper (note: Puel fans will tell you that this is an example of the manager creating a team comfortable in possession).
- Cry at the fact you’re spending hundred of pounds a year to watch this boring shit.
- Turn up again like a dickhead in the hope that you’re wrong.
- Repeat.
Get the **** in there
Today is a bloody good day
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |