If Fryatt is out, I would support bringing MDV back.
We can't bring MdV back, he's gone for the season.
Yes but surely we can do it in quicker than 6 months?Am I?:icon_lol: I don't think I am. This club actually makes decent footballers into poor footballers.
Although if he is injured I'm looking forward to the conspiracy theories that he's missing the Brum game as he has signed a deal to join them in January :icon_cool
We can't bring MdV back, he's gone for the season.
as i under stand it due to city paying most of his wages we could bring him back not that RK would
If that's the case there must be different rules for international loan deals.
If it was a loan between two English clubs they wouldn't be allowed to call the player back before the end of the year.
If that's the case there must be different rules for international loan deals.
If it was a loan between two English clubs they wouldn't be allowed to call the player back before the end of the year.
Great idea
Our midfield players are all completely and utterly shite - so let's play five of the useless feckers
Give me strength.....:icon_roll
just one thing we called logan back from a loan deal from boston didnt we
Don't like it, Hammond on the wing chasing back? Nightmare...
I would go for the following
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |