Biffa Bacon
Well-Known Member
Then surely 3g is pointless if 4g is faster?
My point was there is little point in me paying for broadband when my unlimited 3g is far faster at my home address.
Then surely 3g is pointless if 4g is faster?
My point was there is little point in me paying for broadband when my unlimited 3g is far faster at my home address.
You said that you don't count things being done quicker as a benefit, what did I misunderstand?
Yes with regards to mobile internet. You know, what is being discussed here and not everything in the world.
You skipped the part about something which can be done through a 4g signal which isn't possible through a 3g signal and also why me thinking 4g is pointless makes me an 'Android Fanboy'.
Either you don't understand that as its the 3rd time I've said it now or you cannot answer.
Haha brilliant. I've constantly compared this phone to Samsung as well as Apple. Samsung generally run Android too so I don't see how saying this phones wipes the floor with that makes me an Android fan boy?
How long does it take to download an app now though as that's surely got to be the most commonly used thing that people use a mobile data connection for?
Going back to your analogy - an F1 car is much faster than a normal road car we have now. Why don't we all drive F1 cars as they most certainly are wow factor faster?
GPRS was good enough for a teletext like internet, 3g provides data speeds capable of providing a full internet access.
Media streaming of audio and video is no problem now. Full 1080p streaming may be problematic but considering no phone has a 1080p display and there is little difference between 720p & 1080p at 32" displays it is completely pointless in viewing a 1080p video on a mobile device.
Upload would provide an advantage if you were regularly uploading GBs of videos but I fail to see why you would do that on a mobile device as you would also be restricted to data caps which the vast majority of users will have on their tariffs. Most uploads would be a few pics to Facebook or suchlike or possibly a short mobile video clip from a drunken night out etc which takes seconds as it is now.
Downloading a large game would also be advantageous over 4g but again you're restricted by data allowances so negates that also.
Data allowances will rise in line with increased speeds.
Really? T-mobile gave me unlimited 3g allowance a month ago for the same contract payment if I switch to ee 4g they will give me a 500mb cap.
Data allowances will rise in line with increased speeds.
EE can do what they want at the moment because there's no competition. Once the other 4G networks go live prices will start to come down and allowances will go up. It's always the case that early adopters will pay more.
Its still going to be a hell of a lot more than current rates and with nothing extra
Huge speeds for a single user heavily restricted by data allowances seems quite pointless.
Well talking about a mobile phone, it would be a single user.
If going by the American market which is already open to competition, data limits won't increase much. Well not to any real useable limits anyway.
10GB of data would be swallowed in a couple of hours if 4 users streamed a HD film at the same time.
Alternatively, a single user could watch 4 HD films with their allowance in a month which doesn't seem very useable to me at all.
Do people actually think 3G and 4G will coexist for long?
3G prices have come down massively since it first became available. The same will happen with 4G.
I was looking for old 3G prices to see how they compare. In 2005, Orange charged 50P per Megabyte. I also found a forum post discussing the new 3G service. Someone wrote: "Not much point to 3G really".
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 15 | 36 |
2 | Chelsea | 16 | 34 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
6 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
7 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
8 | Bournemouth | 16 | 25 |
9 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
10 | Fulham | 16 | 24 |
11 | Tottenham | 16 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 16 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
16 | Everton | 15 | 15 |
17 | Leicester | 16 | 14 |
18 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
19 | Wolves | 16 | 9 |
20 | Southampton | 16 | 5 |