i just do, but i am not prepared to say anymore than that>
.
All you know is the same as what anybody else knows. A sacking in June will give rise to a compensatory payment of one month's less salary than a sacking in May. Any reduction that applies because of the lower division that we are now in will apply from the same date whether it relates to actual pay for work or to compensation for no work.
There is no reason related to compensation that Holloway could not have been sacked immediately after the Stoke game.
All of this may be true but my only thought would be that TUO might have a clause in his contract so that he gets paid less if we are in Div 1. That being the case maybe sacking him after such a clause kicked in might be cheaper.
The criterion for such a clause to kick-in has already been fulfilled; it would therefore apply equally whether to pay or to compensation. This is a red-herring which should not be allowed to disguise MM's lack of decisive action.
Holloway said it all "culture of defeat" and "no leadership". These issues need to be addressed just as much as the building the team . No good bringing on or in new players if the culture is that of defeat and/or we have nobody capable of leading the team from the front even when its really tough.
Changing attitude and culture is not done with a two week training course. This sort of change is a slow growing bloom and the seeds need sowing months in advance. You show its changing with your own behaviour and the role model you present. I don't think Holloway can do it.
QPR fit the bill.maybe a club with a feckless manager and money that they dont know how to spend probably
Holloway said it all "culture of defeat" and "no leadership". These issues need to be addressed just as much as the building the team . No good bringing on or in new players if the culture is that of defeat and/or we have nobody capable of leading the team from the front even when its really tough.
Changing attitude and culture is not done with a two week training course. This sort of change is a slow growing bloom and the seeds need sowing months in advance. You show its changing with your own behaviour and the role model you present. I don't think Holloway can do it.
QPR fit the bill.
Probably true. I would have thought that it can only be addressed by a new management and as far as practical a clear out of the playing staff. Obviously, the latter is going to be very difficult but i do think a new culture at Leicester City requires new foundations. The present squad is steeped in defeat and I doubt whether Holloway has a shred of credibility.
The whole club seems steeped in defeat and MM seems not to have changed this attitude.
To be honest Mandaric is part of the problem, 5 managers in 18 months, 30 odd players and now relegated to our lowest ever league position. The guy is as big a failure as the lazy feckers he has paid week in and week out to wear the blue shirt.
The whole club is rotten to the core from the Chairman / Owner all the way down.
I still think MM is looking to get out this summer, it was interesting in his SSN interview that he he would do whats best for the club not what is best for himself or Holloway etc. I think if somebody was prepared to take the club on in it's present state then I think MM would walk away without the blink of an eye.
To be honest Mandaric is part of the problem, 5 managers in 18 months, 30 odd players and now relegated to our lowest ever league position. The guy is as big a failure as the lazy feckers he has paid week in and week out to wear the blue shirt.
The whole club is rotten to the core from the Chairman / Owner all the way down.
I still think MM is looking to get out this summer, it was interesting in his SSN interview that he he would do whats best for the club not what is best for himself or Holloway etc. I think if somebody was prepared to take the club on in it's present state then I think MM would walk away without the blink of an eye.
Lovely thanks. Just can't help feeling we forgot something though.How was the day out Sir?
To be honest Mandaric is part of the problem, 5 managers in 18 months, 30 odd players and now relegated to our lowest ever league position. The guy is as big a failure as the lazy feckers he has paid week in and week out to wear the blue shirt.
The whole club is rotten to the core from the Chairman / Owner all the way down.
I still think MM is looking to get out this summer, it was interesting in his SSN interview that he he would do whats best for the club not what is best for himself or Holloway etc. I think if somebody was prepared to take the club on in it's present state then I think MM would walk away without the blink of an eye.
A bit unfair on MM PFK, I agree that most of his decisions have not paid off, but it is not through the lack of trying. He has backed up these decisions with investment and I am sure that his comments on SSN refer more to having someone else make the decisions by stepping down as chairman. Yes money is obviously at the root of why he is here, but he wants to bring success.
I agree with Redditch that the biggest mistake was not pulling the trigger on Holloway to try and stave off relegation, but he must have thought like many of us that even he couldn't feck it up with the players he had at the club, we now know he/we were wrong.
I think if somebody was prepared to take the club on in it's present state then I think MM would walk away without the blink of an eye.
I don't doubt it.
However, that's not likely to happen.
As I see it, three simple steps are now necessary:
1. Sack Holloway - there is the stench of failure around him and that won't go away.
2. Mandaric gives up his executive responsibilities in recognition that he has made a series of poor decisions and has to take ultimate responsibility for our unnecessary relegation.
3. A new manager is appointed with a brief to get rid at all costs of every player who isn't fully committed to regaining our championship status over a two year time scale.
4. The new chairman and the CEO conduct a thorough review of structures and personnel throughout the club and weed out those with negative attitudes and then start to try to develop a positive culture within the organisation.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 23 | 37 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 23 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Leicester | 23 | 17 |
18 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
19 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |