.....who think that this serves them right?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/6623127.stm
The hotel offer a baby sitting service and they refused this and went for a meal leaving 2 year old twins and a 3 year old girl alone in an apartment. Im sorry but you just dont leave kids that young on their own ffs.
there was a program on it tonight. some of the things the so called experts were saying were not what you want to hear azs the family. a bit too soon if you ask me. not very respectful to the familly
What are you talking about man?At least Coronation St. have done the decent thing by not showing scenes of a very similar nature to what happened in real life in Portugal.
What are you talking about man?
from digitalspyWhat are you talking about man?
Ah, didn't realise. Makes perfect sense, thank youRead in the paper yesterday that they had been filming scenes of a storyline where a child was kidnapped etc. They have decided against putting the storyline on the TV because it is too much like what really happened in real-life.
If that makes any sense.
After my successful prediciton of the Ipswich Ripper, I am back on the case.
I have been flown in to help with the case, my supicious say all is not quite right here, well off family from Rothley and in a secure hotel. Didnt take up the babysitting option, preferring to keep them alone.
I am going with - The local scruff who works as a Premises Officer. But I feel a family friend or relative may have aided or make some 'profit' from it.
I fear the case will never be solved.
After my successful prediciton of the Ipswich Ripper, I am back on the case.
I have been flown in to help with the case, my supicious say all is not quite right here, well off family from Rothley and in a secure hotel. Didnt take up the babysitting option, preferring to keep them alone.
I am going with - The local scruff who works as a Premises Officer. But I feel a family friend or relative may have aided or make some 'profit' from it.
I fear the case will never be solved.
After my successful prediciton of the Ipswich Ripper, I am back on the case.
I have been flown in to help with the case, my supicious say all is not quite right here, well off family from Rothley and in a secure hotel. Didnt take up the babysitting option, preferring to keep them alone.
I am going with - The local scruff who works as a Premises Officer. But I feel a family friend or relative may have aided or make some 'profit' from it.
I fear the case will never be solved.
my theory is someone who works locally to the hotel and kept tabs on the girl and planned to take her with an aide..so similar to your theory hazz...fear the worst for the little girl :icon_conf
Not a joking matter....
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |