mabrah
Well-Known Member
I know what you're saying; it seemed - and indeed LOOKED - negative. It certainly did to me.I still can't forgive the negative approach at home to Fulham though.
I dunno, maybe (that word again) Rodgers thought it was otherwise. Somebody here even remarked the lineup could be said to smack of arrogance. I personally am not sure of the wisdom of the lack of pukka wingers - praps Rodgers though wingbacks were enough. I dunno.
Whatever the reasoning, I know the end result was one of travesty. One in which the players carry a significant portion of culpability; tactics and shape alone didn't **** that up. It IS alarming that this has happened before, and one has to question Rodgers because of that (the ****er can seem wilfully ****ing stubborn and unable to admit error!) but I think that's something the club can address without recourse to P45s.