not to mention the fact he was running after a ball he wouldnt have even got.
Whether he would have got the ball is irrelevant.
not to mention the fact he was running after a ball he wouldnt have even got.
When oh when is Gallagher going to learn how to take a decent corner?
Whether he would have got the ball is irrelevant.
They insist on being called 'Nottingham', even though they're not in Nottingham. Unlike their neighbours, Notts County, who are in Nottingham. While Forest aren't. So, in summary: Notts - in Nottingham. Nottingham - in Notts.
The two most blatant penalties of the night were on Vassell and Wellens. Earnshaw is a diving goofy twat!
I know you love your rules Jeff and the 'letter of the law', but the ref would have had to judge whether Earnshaw was looking for the Pen. The ball going out of play and him running away from goal would have gone against Earnshaw in the decision.
Cunningham's trip on Earnshaw was an accidental coming together of legs. To be a penalty the referee would have to consider it to be careless, reckless or using excessive force according to Law 12.
On the other hand, Cohen's foul on Vassall was a clear hold, a definite penalty, which the ref had a good view of. Since Cohen already had a yellow card, he could have been sent off.
almost got some change out of a Camp clearance as well.
Is there video of the muppet with his arm around Vassell's neck in the penalty area? Was it a penalty?
Was once again very annoyed by Don Goodmans continued "Anti-Leicester" commentary, the guy really is pathetic at times...
So what you are saying is that from now on we should call them West Bridgford Trees??
They started off in woad-wearing times north of the city at the Forest Fields recreation ground - hence the name. Personally West Bridgford Trees would be a better name IMO, and would give some support to my campaign to rename us the Leicester Raw Dykes.
I think Beaumont Fox, Cate etc might not be happy with that name:icon_bigg
Doesn't the foul have to be in the area thoughwellens had his legs taken even more blatantly than earshaw :icon_eek:
Wellens absolutely not. Vassell's would have been very harsh but I believe I would wanted it.
Earnies was a trip pure and simple
Forest the worst side we've seen at the Walkers this year?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |