homer
Well-Known Member
Never stopped you before.
In which case, consider it done
Never stopped you before.
I think he’s alright in a position of need, but people are incorrectly spaffing themselves over him.In which case, consider it done
Quite. Also got to question why Lyon were happy to let him go.I think he’s alright in a position of need, but people are incorrectly spaffing themselves over him.
I think he’s alright in a position of need, but people are incorrectly spaffing themselves over him.
FFS, he was average in the last two games. He didn’t stink the joint out. And you’re probably right about Perez. But that’s because for an increasing number of people if a player isn’t a potential MOTM then he was shit.If Perez had played the last two games in the way Tete has, then we would all be (quite rightly) tearing him to ****ing pieces
Lose to Saints and things get very sobering, very quickly.Today was a perfect example of why you cannot take staying up for granted with this group of players.
We can look good one week and score goals and then be utter bottle jobs next time out.
We are very much in a relegation battle and this isn't the sort of game that will tell us much. We're nowhere near good enough to play so openly against a good side. Although Rodgers was on a hiding to nothing with the selection, I thought his decision making in the second half was dreadful. All subs made seemed to be pre-planned and completely failed to redress the issues we were facing.
When you don't defend well, it stands out when you have a keeper that doesn't make big saves. And today was one of those days. De Gea made two excellent saves and Ward doesn't.
The back four looked like strangers. Faes was awful but Souttar didn't help. Both full backs were okay in my opinion. But the four of them just weren't joined up. They were so easy to play through.
In midfield we were in control in the first half and I don't understand why we took the two off for Tielemans and Soumare. It didn't make any sense to me. Both subs in midfield played really, really, badly.
The forward four were all poor. We have four forwards that love it when the going is good. Tete started well but his tracking back is terrible. Maddison just wasn't it in at all. He looked injured to me. Barnes was a coward and Iheanacho gave one of those performances. All of them were off it.
I've no idea why he thought bringing on Vardy made sense. Praet did well I thought, ran about a lot and made good use of the ball.
Shit show all round really.
Which really isn’t a likely result, is it? And yes, I know they just beat Chelsea.Lose to Saints and things get very sobering, very quickly.
Which really isn’t a likely result, is it? And yes, I know they just beat Chelsea.
At their place? With our inconsistencies and precious little flowers? I think it’s entirely possible.Which really isn’t a likely result, is it? And yes, I know they just beat Chelsea.
The team that played against Villa and Spurs and in the first half at Old Trafford would beat this very shit Southampton team. And even the team that turned up for the second half at OT would stand a good chance of not losing.At their place? With our inconsistencies? I think it’s entirely possible.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |