And you don't have to read it if you don't wish. Although I daresay some people on this chatroom have had a lot more to say on this topic than I have.
I also suggest that some people look up the word 'forum'. It could be a useful exercise.
Well I agree personally, and I suspect that the majority of what people have said regarding Allen on here is rubbish. Certainly Ian Holloway didn't seem to think he was a cocaine addict when he wrote about his unjust dismissal a couple of months ago.
However it's a mystery to me why people choose to 'remove' posts - such as the previous one - which question the nature of the more senior posters, when some of these people are clearly too rude to engage in a serious discussion, but would prefer to make libellous and offensive allegations against people without being in the slightest interested in backing them up.
I'm not a 'chav from Foxestalk' or any of the other 'enemies' that the people on this forum refer to. I asked a question, can you answer it or not? But if you object to me articulately justifying my previous post and explaining why it's relevant, than this is clearly the most Orwellian forum I've ever come across.
I daresay you'll be cutting this too. At times I fear that Leicester fans deserve what they get in life - being, as a collective, unusually fickle and unintelligent for even football fans. Always more willing to tell each other to shut up than to actually make any noise.
Once again I will reiterate, however, that people would be well advised to steer clear from making these sorts of claims about people like Martin Allen unless they are willing to support them. And until the day we know exactly what happened and why, this will be a very valid topic for discussion.
I also suggest that some people look up the word 'forum'. It could be a useful exercise.
Well I agree personally, and I suspect that the majority of what people have said regarding Allen on here is rubbish. Certainly Ian Holloway didn't seem to think he was a cocaine addict when he wrote about his unjust dismissal a couple of months ago.
However it's a mystery to me why people choose to 'remove' posts - such as the previous one - which question the nature of the more senior posters, when some of these people are clearly too rude to engage in a serious discussion, but would prefer to make libellous and offensive allegations against people without being in the slightest interested in backing them up.
I'm not a 'chav from Foxestalk' or any of the other 'enemies' that the people on this forum refer to. I asked a question, can you answer it or not? But if you object to me articulately justifying my previous post and explaining why it's relevant, than this is clearly the most Orwellian forum I've ever come across.
I daresay you'll be cutting this too. At times I fear that Leicester fans deserve what they get in life - being, as a collective, unusually fickle and unintelligent for even football fans. Always more willing to tell each other to shut up than to actually make any noise.
Once again I will reiterate, however, that people would be well advised to steer clear from making these sorts of claims about people like Martin Allen unless they are willing to support them. And until the day we know exactly what happened and why, this will be a very valid topic for discussion.
I also suggest that some people look up the word 'forum'. It could be a useful exercise.
And of course no-one cares about Allen anymore. No-one at all. Totally irrelevant. Quite right. Debate over. Simple as.
My lord you must have some exhilerating discussions. I asked a question, you answer it or you don't. If you know something, say what it is, if you don't, then don't. But don't insult me and then, having done that, delete my post when I object to being insulted.
And before I go, I think there's plenty of evidence to suggest that Martin Allen is still very interesting to Leicester fans.
And of course no-one cares about Allen anymore. No-one at all. Totally irrelevant. Quite right. Debate over. Simple as.
My lord you must have some exhilerating discussions. I asked a question, you answer it or you don't. If you know something, say what it is, if you don't, then don't. But don't insult me and then, having done that, delete my post when I object to being insulted.
And before I go, I think there's plenty of evidence to suggest that Martin Allen is still very interesting to Leicester fans.
where did these stories come from?
What post got deleted?
Well if we're going to descend into this sort of pedantry, which is why I never bother looking at Foxestalk - and all as a consequence of having asked a reasonable question - then take a look in your bloody dictionary. A chatroom is a type of forum. It's like people who say tannoy instead of speaker system.
Well I agree personally, and I suspect that the majority of what people have said regarding Allen on here is rubbish. Certainly Ian Holloway didn't seem to think he was a cocaine addict when he wrote about his unjust dismissal a couple of months ago.
However it's a mystery to me why people choose to 'remove' posts - such as the previous one - which question the nature of the more senior posters, when some of these people are clearly too rude to engage in a serious discussion, but would prefer to make libellous and offensive allegations against people without being in the slightest interested in backing them up.
I'm not a 'chav from Foxestalk' or any of the other 'enemies' that the people on this forum refer to. I asked a question, can you answer it or not? But if you object to me articulately justifying my previous post and explaining why it's relevant, than this is clearly the most Orwellian forum I've ever come across.
I daresay you'll be cutting this too. At times I fear that Leicester fans deserve what they get in life - being, as a collective, unusually fickle and unintelligent for even football fans. Always more willing to tell each other to shut up than to actually make any noise.
Once again I will reiterate, however, that people would be well advised to steer clear from making these sorts of claims about people like Martin Allen unless they are willing to support them. And until the day we know exactly what happened and why, this will be a very valid topic for discussion.
I also suggest that some people look up the word 'forum'. It could be a useful exercise.
However it's a mystery to me why people choose to 'remove' posts - such as the previous one - which question the nature of the more senior posters, when some of these people are clearly too rude to engage in a serious discussion, but would prefer to make libellous and offensive allegations against people without being in the slightest interested in backing them up.
Haven't got a clue, does the software log things like that?
I would imagine it probably does seeing as how it's Orwellian software apparently.
I'm glad the tosser left, never was happy with his appointment. He was a total clown.MA2 knew he was leaving at the Watford game which never happened.
I get erections
I get erections
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 23 | 37 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 23 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Leicester | 23 | 17 |
18 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
19 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |