Boy Genius
Banned
several times......
But the shareholders have been aware of the negotations going on between the board and MM
Milan Mandaric
- Thread starter MHS
- Start date
- Status
several times......
But the shareholders have been aware of the negotations going on between the board and MM
Can you show me one example they've posted here?
Boy Genius
Banned
got better things to do than trawl through all their posts.
Its strange I am not the only one who thought that, luckily I knew they were spouting bollux most of the time
So you don't mind making accusations but can't be bothered to provide any evidence to back it up.
Boy Genius
Banned
So you don't mind making accusations but can't be bothered to provide any evidence to back it up.
not at all, does not bother me, I know what I know and its not just Melton and I who think this.....
Real Sharapova
Well-Known Member
.......for instance there's this man-sized fluffy white rabbit that follows me everywhere.
Dunc
New Member
.......for instance there's this man-sized fluffy white rabbit that follows me everywhere.
And Tyler Durden too.
Steven
Active Member
Hazzman
New Member
Stop 'sexing-yourself-up' Macky.
Macky
Gruntled Member
Constantly or currently?
concurrently. This is what happens when you read bollox on the internet.
To be fair Hazz, no f ucker else is likely to do it.
newtonfox
Active Member
the bit ive found dose not say there is no bid but it dose make it look that way
http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=16179
post number 1 :icon_wink points d to f
Last edited:
Point e says "The indicative offer from Mandaric has changed a number of times since the initial offer", which clearly shows that MM had been revising his offer over a period of time, no suggestion that he hadn't done anything.
Boy Genius
Banned
OldGit
Well-Known Member
It says there was no formal bid- which was undoubtedly true, as several people have repeatedly pointed out - otherwise there would have been no further negotiations going on, which they refer to in that post. It's a perfectly normal process to go through details to come up with a package that both parties can feel comfortable with.
Same as above - but as they also refer to the ongoing negotiations over details of what might form a formal bid, it is hardly "blatantly misleading".
When some of the "insiders" said a few weeks ago that a bid had been received, that was misleading - witness the confusion it created among other posters as to why the board were apparently sitting on it and not making a recomendation.
Leigh
Well-Known Member
Bill says it'll be done by Thursday: http://www.thebluearmy.co.uk/detail...295931&parentkey=1D29|0|2185366269754|p|536|0
Strange, I thought it'd be done by Xmas...no by the Jan transfer window... no by Colchester... no by the Fulham replay......
Strange, I thought it'd be done by Xmas...no by the Jan transfer window... no by Colchester... no by the Fulham replay......
Yorkshire Vixen
Active Member
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 6 | 15 |
| 2 | Manchester C | 6 | 14 |
| 3 | Arsenal | 6 | 14 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 6 | 13 |
| 5 | Aston Villa | 5 | 12 |
| 6 | Fulham | 6 | 11 |
| 7 | Newcastle | 6 | 11 |
| 8 | Brighton | 6 | 9 |
| 9 | Nottm F | 6 | 9 |
| 10 | Tottenham | 5 | 7 |
| 11 | Manchester U | 5 | 7 |
| 12 | Brentford | 6 | 7 |
| 13 | Bournemouth | 5 | 5 |
| 14 | West Ham | 6 | 5 |
| 15 | Everton | 6 | 4 |
| 16 | Leicester | 6 | 3 |
| 17 | Palace | 6 | 3 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 5 | 3 |
| 19 | Southampton | 5 | 1 |
| 20 | Wolves | 6 | 1 |
