Milan says...

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are now nothing more than a pitiful group of condescending, self serving wankers

You are the morons that urged Davies to keep Levein on for a few more weeks (at a time when a certain George Burley was looking for work). Thank god for the army of fans who were chanting "OUT", or he'd still be here now. Pitiful

You are the morons who come on here to criticise others with your patronising "we know more than you" drivel. Pathetic

You are the morons canvassing opinon for groundshare and going onto RL with your "come on Tigers" shenanigans. Absolutely disgraceful

You are the only morons that sit silent over the "team card" fiasco, despite claiming to represent the fans. if you did you would be shouting about this from the rooftops - but you choose to keep your fat mouths shut in case it upsets Timmy and threatens your own personal interests. Truly sickening

Your behaviour over recent weeks sickens me completely. If Milan is the shrewd cookie I think he is he will see right through you, and your desperate self promotion in order to hob-nob with the directors. It's pitiful

Fiddling while Rome burns, hopefully.


Great post Homer, the FT are a disgrace and I will be deeply concerned if they continue to be involved with the club. The way they have conducted themselves has been nothing short of embarrassing and pitiful.
 
A continued cycle of sacking managers & paying compensation will get the club nowhere, the money spent paying off managers & coaches in recent seasons has reduced the money available to spend on players by close to £1m now.

Christ I hadn't thought of that, a blueprint for Premiership success! Now go get the lego set out, see if you can make us the 60,000 seat stadium that we will need.
 
Last edited:
we wouldnt have to continually sack managers if we got good ones, and who seriously thought kelly would ever fit the bill? i can be rather smug and say i didn't, but then i'm not a cost cutting arse who chose him simply because he would be the cheapest option available
 
I can't see how Milan being owed money (if true) would put the leicester deal in jeopardy.

I am also really not convinced as to how credible this is. He can't surely have forgotten that he was owed 30 odd million, its not like getting home and realising you forgot to buy some milk.

I think I will give this rumour as much respect as the one about Jamie Redknapp.

It would nevertheless be interesting to hear what Newts or BH can dig up...as for the Foxes Trust, don't bother wasting your time typing, I don't know the answers and don't need you to tell me that you do but can't say. I also gave up on teaching because I have a very short fuse for childish behaviour, nedless to say the way you have attacked Newts on this and other forums is childish in the extreme.
 
If he still effectively half owns Portsmouth, he can't own another club, it's the FA's rules.

But being owed money is not conclusive proof that he still owns Portsmouth.

The only quote they have in that story is allegedly from one of Milan's friends who says he is owed money, NOT yes he still owns 50% of Portsmouth.

Big difference.
 
Last edited:
But being owed money is not conclusive proof that he still owns Portsmouth.

The only quote they have in that story is allegedly from one of Milan's friends who says he is owed money, NOT yes he still owns 50% of Portsmouth.

Big difference.

Some stuff ona Portsmouth message board suggests he still owns 50% of Portsmouth, although this is apparently not new news.
 
Some stuff ona Portsmouth message board suggests he still owns 50% of Portsmouth, although this is apparently not new news.

If true he had better get his shit in order and get those transfer papers signed.
 
my understanding is that gaydermak still owes milan the money beacuse milan dosnt want to put the money in his american account because there will be massive tax on it

or something like that
 
You are now nothing more than a pitiful group of condescending, self serving wankers

You are the morons that urged Davies to keep Levein on for a few more weeks (at a time when a certain George Burley was looking for work). Thank god for the army of fans who were chanting "OUT", or he'd still be here now. Pitiful


Yes - Homer, you have said what I think about the inappropriately called "Foxes Trust" - in slightly more direct language!

Just to dwell on that point about the fans calling for the sacking of managers: where the FT will sit is with the establishment that means it will echo the position of the board on how much confidence it has in an incumbant...right up to the point where he gets the push or walks; then it will welcome the new appointment.

Whereas you get from the "army of fans" an honest reaction to the situation not mediated by worries about contractual issues and pay offs etc.I think the gut reaction of the fans is normally correct...and actually I think the Leicester crowd is reasonably patient. The main exception i can think of is the criticism of that fine manager Jimmy Bloomfield when we were consistently in the top half of the top tier of English football...and playing champagne football. I can't believe that there are too many people who have watched the team who think that poor old Rob Kelly is the right bloke to manage LCFC; that he has brought in anything but a load of rubbish and that he isn't consistently out thought by opposing managers and that he carries the confidence of a (ropey) bunch of players.

Now it's not nice to call for someone to be sacked....but football isn't normal life and it's part and parcel of getting the inflated salaries associated with the game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the gut reaction of the fans is normally correct...

Someone started a poll here a few days ago, and the majority wanted Kelly to stay. Fans were singing Kelly's name during the match yesterday, and I didn't hear any chants for him to be sacked.
So if the FT think Kelly should stay it seems they're only reflecting the views of the majority of supporters.
 
Someone started a poll here a few days ago, and the majority wanted Kelly to stay. Fans were singing Kelly's name during the match yesterday, and I didn't hear any chants for him to be sacked.
So if the FT think Kelly should stay it seems they're only reflecting the views of the majority of supporters.

I heard the Kelly song once yesterday but it was sung by a minority and didn't last very long
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top