The FT have not argued with one peice of the information given.
Yes they have. They have said the information you posted earlier wasn't from the current version - http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showpost.php?p=377017&postcount=613
The FT have not argued with one peice of the information given.
Not the case here though is it? The FT have not argued with one peice of the information given.
Is the bid set out in Times or Arial?
No Food, No shit.
no ring no fire
Yes they have. They have said the information you posted earlier wasn't from the current version - http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showpost.php?p=377017&postcount=613
No Bodger No Badger
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |