Nigel Pearson should he stay or should he go?

should he stay or go?

  • keep him regardless of promotion or not

    Votes: 24 41.4%

  • sack him at the end of the season; if we dont go up

    Votes: 23 39.7%

  • Sack him now

    Votes: 11 19.0%
  • Total voters
    58
  • Poll closed .
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
article-2108828-12010F34000005DC-533_634x809.jpg
 
Macky said:
Just imagine L1 chanting in unison "Paulo, Paulo, give us a sieg heil".

How wonderful would that be? If the players don't respond to that kind of genuine support, we might as well just give it up all together
Click to expand...

Howzabout :
"Sieg heil, if you love Lestoh,
Sieg heil, if you love Lestoh"
Etc etc
 
Can we change the club badge if Di Canio comes?
 
Macky said:
They matter because he's a dirty, disgusting, filthy, scumbag fascist and a sizeable section of our support would find his appointment unacceptable.
Click to expand...


What about the sizeable dirty, filthy, scumbag fascist section of our support? I presume they would find his appointment more than welcome.
 
He may be a vile shithouse fascist bastard

But he would OUR vile shithouse fascist bastard

plus he pushed that dopey goober ref over, which was pretty funny

Gerrimin....
 
bocadillo said:
What about the sizeable dirty, filthy, scumbag fascist section of our support? I presume they would find his appointment more than welcome.
Click to expand...

Yes, they would. Still, with the support divided at least they won't notice any garbage being served up on the pitch
 
Mawsley said:
Surely there's a wealth of top flight managers who would love to come and manage this club, guaranteeing a spectacular pay-off when the ever so fickle fans turn on him well before the end of his contract?
Click to expand...


Probably.
 
Once before the club replaced Nigel Pearson with some designer manager; can somebody remind me how that turned out.

Since Martin O'Neill the club has appointed eleven managers. Seven of them have been poor (not counting interim managers). Only four of them IMO have been good managers though two - Holloway and Sven - did not do a good job with us for whatever reason. The only one who ranks with Nigel Pearson is Micky Adams and I feel that he inherited a better team than Nigel.

The problem comes from a "promotion or sack" mentality . Short term results are what led to Wolves sacking the man most likely to save them last season. It has led to Reading sacking the man who got them into the Premier League and was their best chance of survival thereby following the successful example of QPR.

The important question is whether Leicester are going in the right direction - not in terms of one match or one month - but a season. I believe that Nigel Pearson is a good manager. If we get promotion great. If we don't I want Nigel, Craig and Steve to sit down and work out where we need to be strengthened.

Patience.
 
David Gwilliam said:
Once before the club replaced Nigel Pearson with some designer manager; can somebody remind me how that turned out.

Since Martin O'Neill the club has appointed eleven managers. Seven of them have been poor (not counting interim managers). Only four of them IMO have been good managers though two - Holloway and Sven - did not do a good job with us for whatever reason. The only one who ranks with Nigel Pearson is Micky Adams and I feel that he inherited a better team than Nigel.

The problem comes from a "promotion or sack" mentality . Short term results are what led to Wolves sacking the man most likely to save them last season. It has led to Reading sacking the man who got them into the Premier League and was their best chance of survival thereby following the successful example of QPR.

The important question is whether Leicester are going in the right direction - not in terms of one match or one month - but a season. I believe that Nigel Pearson is a good manager. If we get promotion great. If we don't I want Nigel, Craig and Steve to sit down and work out where we need to be strengthened.

Patience.
Click to expand...

Amen to that David. Though it won't be popular on here.
 
David Gwilliam said:
Once before the club replaced Nigel Pearson with some designer manager; can somebody remind me how that turned out.

Since Martin O'Neill the club has appointed eleven managers. Seven of them have been poor (not counting interim managers). Only four of them IMO have been good managers though two - Holloway and Sven - did not do a good job with us for whatever reason. The only one who ranks with Nigel Pearson is Micky Adams and I feel that he inherited a better team than Nigel.

The problem comes from a "promotion or sack" mentality . Short term results are what led to Wolves sacking the man most likely to save them last season. It has led to Reading sacking the man who got them into the Premier League and was their best chance of survival thereby following the successful example of QPR.

The important question is whether Leicester are going in the right direction - not in terms of one match or one month - but a season. I believe that Nigel Pearson is a good manager. If we get promotion great. If we don't I want Nigel, Craig and Steve to sit down and work out where we need to be strengthened.

Patience.
Click to expand...

Spot on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top