Matt_B
Well-Known Member
You've missed the point.
The bottom three clubs are the three promoted sides.
This is not a coincidence.
It's very tough for a promoted team. Burnley have the best excuse - they are light on finance.
We are supposed to have resources - the owners said so.
The club failed to do sufficient business in the summer
If we get relegated then it will cost a lot more than an extra £20m or so that was needed to buy say 3 more quality players to help bridge the gap.
I don't blame specifically Pearson. Others should have known better too. Pearson was hardly going to tell the staff that they weren't good enough - but without quality additions they are not. The best I've always thought we could do with current resources is about 17th - i.e. in spite of the fantastic start the position is not good.
My guess is that when managers have watched us- including the Man U game - they were not purring about our excellence but rumbling our weaknesses.
I understand that you find it difficult to fault the club.....but they went to sleep over the summer.
And what if we'd spent the 20m and still got relegated? We'd be a lot worse financially. I haven't not blamed the club, I don't see anything to blame, we are finding it difficult which is exactly as I expected it to be with a sensible approach. Just because we have more money than Burnley doesn't mean we should piss it away.