Pearson to be sacked in the next 5 games?

[Macky]

Harry ****ing Redknapp is a ****. A fat, noisy, tomato faced **** that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the club. He shouldn't even be allowed watch us on the telly

 

[Profondo Rosso]

You forgot to mention that his sagging cheeks look like a pair of testicles.

 

[Scotfox]

Macky there are some things in your post I agree with but they have been starred out.

 

[Lako42]

I don't need to list the things Harry Redknapp has achieved because you shouldn't have to ask that question.

Yes you do, because I have not a clue what they all are.

Especially the ones relevent to getting us out of this division.

 

[Real Sharapova]

He shouldn't even be allowed watch us on the telly

:icon_bigg:icon_bigg:icon_bigg

 

[Macky]

Macky there are some things in your post I agree with but they have been starred out.

You need to change your settings lad, disable censorship

 

[gregs_y2k]

I completely agree with everything you've said. I'm a huge ARRY fan so I'm a bit biased.

HOWEVER - it would be a disgraceful & devastating move by the club to do it now and to have done it (allegedly) behind NP's back whilst he was still in charge is nothing short of disgusting.

P.S - Nobody will agree with you.

This all came about prior to the Burnley game though, so it's all probably and hopefully water under the bridge now. I think it would be bad PR for the club if we did it and yes there is a risk it could write off the season too. I'm just saying that doesn't mean it can't and shouldn't be considered. If I was running Leicester I'd want to talk to Harry and feel him out, see if he can work with what we've got etc. If he said he wanted a transfer budget of £15 mill for January, then I'd turn around and say, I think we're ok as we are and it's too much of a risk to start from scratch again when we don't need to.

 

[gregs_y2k]

Ask Southampton fans what they think of him, he was relegated with them. Ask most Portsmouth fans and they blame him for their eventual relegation. He did OK at Spurs - we don't have the kind of money he was able to throw around there. West Ham fans have mixed views about his managerial talents. He would be a goatfuck of the first order at our place.

He did ok at Spurs? Compared to the managers before him he was Midas. Got them into Champions League Qualifying league positions twice (albeit they didn't qualify second time because Chelsea somehow won it) If that's not overachieving please tell me what is.

 

[Macky]

I'm just saying that doesn't mean it can't and shouldn't be considered. If I was running Leicester I'd want to talk to Harry

Thanks be to Jebus that you aren't running the club so

 

[gregs_y2k]

Thanks be to Jebus that you aren't running the club so

Seriously, what is wrong with wanting to talk to a manager that finished 4th in the Premier League the season before? Bear in mind that if this is true it happened 4 games ago before the winning streak started. I'm not saying Pearson should be ousted. I'm just saying the club hasn't done anything wrong to contemplate the idea of bringing in a manager like Redknapp

 

[Profondo Rosso]

Seriously what is wrong with wanting to talk to a manager that finished 4th in the Premier League the season before. Bear if this is true it happened 4 games ago before the winning streak.

It's slimy and incredibly unprofessional to talk to someone when you already have an employee in that position and completely undermines the person in that job is what's wrong with it. If I found out my employers talked to someone about replacing me when I was still in a job I'd be incredibly pissed off and resign without a second's hesitation as it'd be clear they didn't value me and I wasn't wanted there and I wouldn't want to work for people who did that to me ever again.

 

[OldGit]

Seriously, what is wrong with wanting to talk to a manager that finished 4th in the Premier League the season before? Bear in mind that if this is true it happened 4 games ago before the winning streak started. I'm not saying Pearson should be ousted. I'm just saying the club hasn't done anything wrong to contemplate the idea of bringing in a manager like Redknapp

Tell us where you work. We'll suggest it to your boss

 

[gregs_y2k]

It's slimy and incredibly unprofessional to talk to someone when you already have an employee in that position and completely undermines the person in that job is what's wrong with it. If I found out my employers talked to someone about replacing me when I was still in a job I'd be incredibly pissed off and resign without a second's hesitation.

happens all the time in football in the transfer market....is that wrong then? Why differentiate the two?

 

[gregs_y2k]

Tell us where you work. We'll suggest it to your boss

I'm my own boss

 

[Biffa Bacon]

Seriously, what is wrong with wanting to talk to a manager that finished 4th in the Premier League the season before? Bear in mind that if this is true it happened 4 games ago before the winning streak started. I'm not saying Pearson should be ousted. I'm just saying the club hasn't done anything wrong to contemplate the idea of bringing in a manager like Redknapp

Undermining your manager by talking to anyone and everyone is a shit way to run a business, especially when a change will cost a fortune, is unlikely to work in the short term and isn't necessary. If the Thais are talking to Harry they are total morons.

 

[Real Sharapova]

He did ok at Spurs? Compared to the managers before him he was Midas. Got them into Champions League Qualifying league positions twice (albeit they didn't qualify second time because Chelsea somehow won it) If that's not overachieving please tell me what is.

With the money he spent at Spurs he did OK. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't like Daniel Levy at all, but in terms of running a football club he's a smart cookie. He seems to have sussed out that 'Arry is all piss and wind.

 

[Macky]

Seriously, what is wrong with wanting to talk to a manager that finished 4th in the Premier League the season before?

It is wrong because it is a ****ish thing to do.
It is also wrong because it is Harry ****ing ****ing Wankstain Redknapp

 

[Profondo Rosso]

happens all the time in football in the transfer market....is that wrong then? Why differentiate the two?

No it doesn't. Players aren't sacked and replaced by others. They may be given competition for their place in the team but players aren't sacked and kicked off the payroll to be replaced by others like managers or people in the vast majority of employees are.

 

[gregs_y2k]

With the money he spent at Spurs he did OK. Nothing more, nothing less. I don't like Daniel Levy at all, but in terms of running a football club he's a smart cookie. He seems to have sussed out that 'Arry is all piss and wind.

He spent a lot less than the big 4 in those season and turned a disastrous campaign around for them when he was first hired. I'm sorry but he did a fantastic job at Spurs. Anything to the contrary is rubbish.

 

[gregs_y2k]

No it doesn't. Players aren't sacked and replaced by others. They may be given competition for their place in the team but players aren't sacked and kicked off the payroll to be replaced by others like managers or people in the vast majority of employees are.

They're moved on though.