Crikey, people are strange.
If you randomly asked 100 supporters, 100 players, 100 managers, 100 chairmen, etc, whether they'd think Leicester would have a better chance of promotion and then survival in the Prem managed by Redknapp or Pearson, the vast majority (90%+) would say Redknapp. He's proved miles more than NP ever has or is ever likely to. To suggest anything else is barking mad.
If the Thai's talked to HR when we were in the midst of losing 4 out of 5 games, including a horribly humiliating cup exit, they were doing their job a lot better than last year when they sacked Sven with no Plan B. NP knows the score. He's got to get us promoted this season or he's out. If we look unlikely to get promoted, he'll go, whenever that judgement is made.
I've no idea whether NP is the right man for us, nor do any of you. It's guesswork, hoping and predicting. HR could end up here and be a disaster in the same terms. But odds are, he'd be a better bet than most because he's got an excellent record of improving sides with a bit of cash.
At the end of the day, the Thai's own the club and can do whatever they like. If they think HR is a better bet than NP, it's their money and their prerogative. To say you won't support the team if they do make a change is suggesting that whatever goes on is in any way anything to do with you. It's not, we support, they decide.