Pearson to be sacked in the next 5 games?

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously, our owners are going to **** up our best start to a season in ages? Muppets of the highest order.
 
And another thing, why has NP got his Agent out and about talking up rumours that the owners have been speaking to HR? This is the only semi-official confirmation from any source that there is some mileage in the story. NP has initiated the growing speculation himself. Has anyone ever heard a peep from his Agent before? He's talked on instruction.

It's got feck all to do with NP who the owners talk to about his job or anyone else's. If he doesn't like it, and he clearly believes it's happened, then he should shut up or quit. He does himself no favours sometimes.
 
Feck off 'Arry. Pearson deserves a crack. Slowly turning things around, we will get promoted under him even if it is not necessarily this year. Have a bit of patience.

Just have this feeling that bringing in Redknapp would be just like bringing in Sven, big names does not = premier league football. Hopefully the Thais learned their lesson last time..
 
I have recently read a rumour on Twitter that we may be interested in signing Harry Redknap, has anybody else heard this rumour too?
 
4-4-2 said:
I'd be surprised if there was any mention of any sport in the bulletin at 8pm as we generally don't put any in as it's quite short.

As for substance - we led with City/Pearson/Redknapp in our main afternoon sports bulletins due to what Pearson's agent said to Talksport earlier today.
Click to expand...

What was said on Talksport?
 
So basically all they did was repeat rumours, probably picked up from a forum like this, which is where agents get their information.
 
Does anybody else think Pearson probably put his agent up to this? He gets the fans (even more) on side and helps spread the view that the owners would be mad to sack him at the minute. I suspect this is a bit of Nigel making his own moves to guarantee, as far as possible, his own job security. And also warning the owners that he isn't pleased that they may have spoken to somebody else about his own position. Pushing the owners into a supportive statement was probably partly the aim, here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top