ChrisFilter
Member
I didn't say it was just you did i?
No, but from the things you listed I got the sense that you were including me in your collection of 'right idiots'.
I didn't say it was just you did i?
There's also been study after study that says that global warming isn't a problem but I think most of us would accept that it is.
Need to get back to my John Stuart Mill essay now, may bring some of the interesting thoughts mentioned here into that.
No, but from the things you listed I got the sense that you were including me in your collection of 'right idiots'.
Some of your statements were as sweeping as those in opposition.
I wasn't trying to make light of your point, I'm sorry to hear that you have been made the subject of racist abuse for most of your life. The great thing about this forum, (and indeed at football matches), is that nowadays people are willing to confront the two of the three worst forms of abuse - racism and sexism. Hopefully, we will start to take homophobia seriously soon...probably the next generation? Hopefully sooner!
Anyone with any sense takes it seriously now I would hope.
Now then, multiculturalism versus integration. Who's going first?!
(5) Anyone born in England is English
A few brief points:
(1) I had originally assumed that the Forest chant was aimed at our Thai ownership and not at our multicultural city.
(2) Nottingham also is a multicultural city.
(3) English is not a race - English is a nationality. Groups like the English Defence League pervert the word. When Brian Deane played for his country he was just as English as when Gary Lineker did.
(4) As this is a football forum it should be pointed out that football has got it right. Your nationality is the country you could play for - and for some people that is more than one country.
(5) Anyone born in England is English - though they may have other identities as well. However, people can be born elsewhere and still be English. I cannot resist pointing out that Leicester's own great Englishman Simon De Montfort was born in France. He arguably spoke for England like no other patriotic Englishman of his age. It would be a foolish person who told Amir Khan (born in Bolton) or Dame Kelly Holmes (born in Kent) that their race stopped them being English.
(6) At the two away matches I have been to this season - Coventry and the league match against Forest - I noticed that many Leicester fans had no interest in what was happening on the pitch except when the score could be used to taunt the other supporters. We are told that there were chants about Brian Clough being dead and that innocent motorists had their car windows spat on. Perhaps we should be more concerned about our own problem supporters than those of other clubs.
I'm not really sure about this one, David. If someone here grew up in England with English parents and spent their whole lives living in England, but were born when their parents lived in say, Sweden, (just as an example) for a very brief period and they'd spent only the first month of their life in Sweden. I can understand if that person classed themselves as English and didn't class themselves as being Swedish.
Depends whether you view nationality as something with set rules or what someone defines themselves as I guess.
I'm glad I read that to the end, a good post. I did originally wonder if our fans would have made such a deal out of this had it not been a rival set of fans (though of course I think they should have and did rightly so in this case). Unfortunately, I don't think they would have, else they would have when our own fans were racist and homophobic.
Or even whether it should be considered important at all. Defining ourselves by arbitrary lines in the sand is as ridiculous as doing so on the colour of our skin or the size of our feet, to me.
I agree and said the same thing earlier about our fans doing something similar. Unfortunately, some people have come across as trivialising serious issues get clouded and made it look like silly one upmanship against a rival team where it shouldn't be. I'm glad they're bringing the issues to attention, but like you I'm wondering if it wasn't against Forest whether they'd do this and even moreso whether it was our own fans.
Like I said earlier, after the Brighton game there was a thread on FoxesTalk where nearly all of the users on their laughed off chants like "you're just a town full of faggots" as "harmless banter" yet plenty of exactly the same people are posting on there now and going red in the face over Forest fans signing "town full of Pakis" to us, which is sad to see, not because they are going red in the face, but because of the hypocrisy of it. These issues should be brought up, but some of our fans have just make it look like their picking and chosing for petty one upmanship over a rival team, rather than wanting to tackle a genuine issue, regardless of who it is doing it, which is what they should be doing.
In an ideal world where prejudice against groups of people doesn't exist, you are right, however we don't live in that ideal world and it is important for often prejudiced against minority groups to define themselves as such and stand up against that.
CowesHow does it smell?
If you think that racism, sexism and homophobia are the three worst forms of abuse, then you really are mentally challenged.
If I don't like a programme on telly, I don't keep watching it.
If this forum makes you feel a little jumpy, then you know what to do!
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |