Did anyone else draw parallels between Southgate's success and style of play and Enzo's? I seem to remember some people moaning about Enzo' sideways and back passing, saying it was boring, the lack of substitutes and refusal to cahnge styles as and when needed etc. While others pointed to the success it brought. For some games, you could literally cut and paste match reviews, leave out the names, and it would be difficult to know which manager you were talking about?
It's strange how some defend Enzo to the hilt and at the same time are glad to see the back of Southgate.