I think some people prefer this version
I did think about allowing sig pictures as an option, with the default not showing the pictures, so most people wouldn't notice any difference.
But if I did that I'd end up having to switch it on for myself to make sure people aren't using dodgy pictures, so there's no chance of it happening.
Right down at the bottom on the left.
The drop down thingy will say 'test'. Change it to the default, or whatever one you prefer!
I can only see that as a good thing and have no idea why anyone would want a picture in there signature when they have an avatar. Plus it adds time to the page loading
Well done me then. I'll go and give myself a medal.Mainly from you if I remember correctly
The server is shite.That is the other major difference between both sites.
FT is incredibly slow, ridiculously slow to render a page.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Will the debate ever end?
No, of course the debate won't end, but it's been quite an interesting thread, obviously not for you but it won't make any difference to your life if you never read it again.
Didn't say it would, it was a rhetorical question.....
The debate has been going on for a few years now, it is obvious the people who prefer this forum will read/post on it and vice versa.
What is the ****ing point in bringing this up every day, it is getting more repetitive than the 'Who Will Be Next LCFC Manager' threads!!!
Good point, well made M17TT C.What is the ****ing point in bringing this up every day, it is getting more repetitive than the 'Who Will Be Next LCFC Manager' threads!!!
Good point, well made M17TT C.
I have to say, roast beef flavour for me, pickled onion is for peasants
The debate has been going on for a few years now, it is obvious the people who prefer this forum will read/post on it and vice versa.
What is the ****ing point in bringing this up every day, it is getting more repetitive than the 'Who Will Be Next LCFC Manager' threads!!!
I can only see that as a good thing and have no idea why anyone would want a picture in there signature when they have an avatar. Plus it adds time to the page loading
Well....obviously.
So what is the point in continuing a debate if it is only going to be one-sided?
Everyday??? I don't remember any other threads.
Considering you are one of the more 'prolific' posters on this site, you must agree the the topic of TB Vs FT has arisen a fair few number of times over the past week or so.
I've no idea what tumbleweed is meant to represent.
It is boring, despite the amount of weed you smoke, surely you must be able to remember how often this topic is brought up on here. Even I can remember it!!
Why is people having a discussion about both sites a problem?
Why is someone expressing their feelings that this is an over used topic for discussion such a problem?
It is just that, a discussion, if I ever see a thread that doesn't interest me I just ignore it.
As you say, 'it is just that', but instead of ignoring it, I have decided to make a contribution to it, in the vein hope that people will finally make an end to this ridiculous, childish debate.
It's pretty simple, if you like it on here then stay, but if you prefer it on 'the other side', then **** off over there.
It's almost like a Forest fan saying, 'Who do you like more, Us or LCFC?'
Obviously, being the Forest fan, it would say them, just like an FT/TB poster would wank over their preferred forum
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |