Talking Balls vs FoxesTalk

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish I hadn't said anything now as I thought he was 16. :icon_conf :icon_conf

Save it for the judge.

M17TT C. There are several posters on here who are members of both forums, and since recently several FT members have joined here, the discussion seems relevent to me. I Don't think the original post of this thread was meant to trigger a FT bashing, rather a genuine discussion of the pros and cons of each, perhaps to decide if it as worth joining FT, maybe in addition to this site?

While FT gets regular mentions here, particular recently with the afore mentioned members joining here, i do not recall, recently, a discussion of it merits.
 
Last edited:
M17TT C. There are several posters on here who are members of both forums, and since recently several FT members have joined here, the discussion seems relevent to me. I Don't think the original post of this thread was meant to trigger a FT bashing, rather a genuine discussion of the pros and cons of each, perhaps to decide if it as worth joining FT, maybe in addition to this site?

Will respond with half-arsed attempt of a post after I have been to work. All I can say at this moment in time is, bollox!
 
M17TT C said:
Well....obviously. :102:
So what is the point in continuing a debate if it is only going to be one-sided? :102:



Everyday??? I don't remember any other threads. :102:
Considering you are one of the more 'prolific' posters on this site, you must agree the the topic of TB Vs FT has arisen a fair few number of times over the past week or so.



I've no idea what tumbleweed is meant to represent. :102:
It is boring, despite the amount of weed you smoke, surely you must be able to remember how often this topic is brought up on here. Even I can remember it!!



Why is people having a discussion about both sites a problem?
Why is someone expressing their feelings that this is an over used topic for discussion such a problem?
It is just that, a discussion, if I ever see a thread that doesn't interest me I just ignore it.
As you say, 'it is just that', but instead of ignoring it, I have decided to make a contribution to it, in the vein hope that people will finally make an end to this ridiculous, childish debate.

It's pretty simple, if you like it on here then stay, but if you prefer it on 'the other side', then **** off over there.

It's almost like a Forest fan saying, 'Who do you like more, Us or LCFC?'

Obviously, being the Forest fan, it would say them, just like an FT/TB poster would wank over their preferred forum

I'm 'prolific', oh yes, back of the net!

I post on both forums as it goes* & I still don't see why you have a problem with us discussing both fora (that's the plural of 'forum')

Aside from the recent bitch fight that they had over there, which resulted in some spanners pretending to defect, there haven't been any other threads like this that I remember.





*mainly here, prolific actually, but occasionally there as well usually just to shit stir.
 
Will respond with half-arsed attempt of a post after I have been to work. All I can say at this moment in time is, bollox!

I find it quite amusing that you seem to care about the contents of this thread more than anyone else.
 
A question for Jeff mainly, but I welcome other views.

I have been a 'founding' member with Jeff, Joe Fox, MK Fox and Homer, since the re-launch in May 2003.

I witnessed the 'carnage' as the kids took their toys they had thrown out of the pram and formed FT!

I have noticed a couple of times over the last few months while the takeover was going on particularly, that if there was 'consultation' from LCFC or the Foxes Trust, it appeared to go there first and then filter across to us.

Obviously this is upsetting, as I feel we are more knowledgeable and have more fun, but deserve to be taken seriously.

Do they have more active members than us or are they just more 'vocal' towards LCFC and the Foxes Trust?

webmaster 24-05-2003 5,125 N/A
Anonymous 24-05-2003 5,295 01-01-1970
Jeff 26-05-2003 8,985 N/A
Filbo 26-05-2003 0 01-01-1970
Filbert 26-05-2003 7 14-09-2007
Joe_Fox 29-05-2003 16,687 Yesterday October 16, 1979 28
true blue 29-05-2003 21 Yesterday December 31, 1966 40
xsubmariner 29-05-2003 622 14-01-2006 February 2, 1960 47
Yobo 29-05-2003 4 24-11-2003
Vixen 29-05-2003 59 24-06-2005
SamuearlJackson 29-05-2003 387 27-10-2007
Fox Fan 29-05-2003 2,443 Today May 14, 1989 18
MKFox 29-05-2003 15,442 Today July 30, 1969 38
homer 29-05-2003 10,911 Yesterday February 10, 1966 41
Mike - True Blue Tinter 29-05-2003 1,112 Today December 28, 1953 53 City Fan 29-05-2003 1,352 Today June 20, 1988 19
step 29-05-2003 1,306 Yesterday
morris1234 29-05-2003 37 14-02-2005
pds 30-05-2003 5,232 N/A September 9, 1985 22
mad biker 30-05-2003 534 11-06-2006
blackpoolfox 30-05-2003 0 01-01-1970
Robsdee 30-05-2003 94 Yesterday
Naughty Fox 30-05-2003 1,666 Yesterday
Malf 30-05-2003 1,667 24-01-2007
Mac 30-05-2003 2 08-10-2007 December 25, 1955 51
 
webmaster 24-05-2003 5,125 N/A
Anonymous 24-05-2003 5,295 01-01-1970
Jeff 26-05-2003 8,985 N/A
Filbo 26-05-2003 0 01-01-1970
Filbert 26-05-2003 7 14-09-2007
Joe_Fox 29-05-2003 16,687 Yesterday October 16, 1979 28
true blue 29-05-2003 21 Yesterday December 31, 1966 40
xsubmariner 29-05-2003 622 14-01-2006 February 2, 1960 47
Yobo 29-05-2003 4 24-11-2003
Vixen 29-05-2003 59 24-06-2005
SamuearlJackson 29-05-2003 387 27-10-2007
Fox Fan 29-05-2003 2,443 Today May 14, 1989 18
MKFox 29-05-2003 15,442 Today July 30, 1969 38
homer 29-05-2003 10,911 Yesterday February 10, 1966 41
Mike - True Blue Tinter 29-05-2003 1,112 Today December 28, 1953 53 City Fan 29-05-2003 1,352 Today June 20, 1988 19
step 29-05-2003 1,306 Yesterday
morris1234 29-05-2003 37 14-02-2005
pds 30-05-2003 5,232 N/A September 9, 1985 22
mad biker 30-05-2003 534 11-06-2006
blackpoolfox 30-05-2003 0 01-01-1970
Robsdee 30-05-2003 94 Yesterday
Naughty Fox 30-05-2003 1,666 Yesterday
Malf 30-05-2003 1,667 24-01-2007
Mac 30-05-2003 2 08-10-2007 December 25, 1955 51

What's your point Fox Fan?Are you trying to let us know you're nearly 19
 
What's your point Fox Fan?Are you trying to let us know you're nearly 19


Glad you noticed, I was simply pointing out those of us who have been here from the start.


Who was originally around when Filbertsteet.net first started? I posted on it for about 6 months before it changed, although I had been aware of it for some time before that.
 
Glad you noticed

My attention to detail is often my downfall.


Who was originally around when Filbertsteet.net first started? I posted on it for about 6 months before it changed, although I had been aware of it for some time before that.

I doubt I was there when it first started but I was there for a good few months before the change & still use my filbertstreet.net email address.
By the way would anybody be interested in helping me release some money from my late husbands bank account? He was a Nigerian minister & I'm prepared to transfer $16 000 000 (16 MILLION US DOLLARS) into your account.
PM me your credit card & bank account details if you're interested
 
Wish you'd all piss off and leave it to me, alex, Dunc, Webbo and James Walker

Wankers
 
It's a non-contest, Foxestalk is far superior^
 
I'm on here more often, but have actually posted on FT more. I generally agree with what's posted on here so I don't feel the need to add anything.

On FT I see so much crap posted that I can't help replying, and trying to explain that Kaebi is not a god and steve walsh should not be the next manager.
 
The server is shite.

The amount of times the site crashes when three or more people access it is ridiculous.

I guess it simply can't handle all of the Monster Munch polls.
At it's busiest FT gets at least 3 times more visiters than Talking Balls does during the same time, so it is going to crash under that kind of pressure. Unfortunately unlike TB, FT doesn't have the funds available to pay for a top of the range server, but even then we don't place ads all over the place in order to make more money from the site itself.
 
Last edited:
At it's busiest FT gets at least 3 times more visiters than Talking Balls does during the same time, so it is going to crash under that kind of pressure. Unfortunately unlike TB, FT doesn't have the funds available to pay for a top of the range server, but even then we don't place ads all over the place in order to make more money from the site itself.

:icon_roll Haven't you grown up yet,does it ****ing matter?
 
At it's busiest FT gets at least 3 times more visiters than Talking Balls does during the same time, so it is going to crash under that kind of pressure. Unfortunately unlike TB, FT doesn't have the funds available to pay for a top of the range server, but even then we don't place ads all over the place in order to make more money from the site itself.

I know you pay for FT out of your own pocket and we are grateful. :038: :038: :icon_wink
 
At it's busiest FT gets at least 3 times more visiters than Talking Balls does during the same time, so it is going to crash under that kind of pressure. Unfortunately unlike TB, FT doesn't have the funds available to pay for a top of the range server, but even then we don't place ads all over the place in order to make more money from the site itself.

They'd look an awful lot better than the horrific picture sigs all over the place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1639
2Chelsea1735
3Arsenal1733
4Nottm F1731
5Bournemouth1728
6Aston Villa1728
7Manchester C  1727
8Newcastle1726
9Fulham1725
10Brighton1725
11Tottenham 1723
12Brentford1723
13Manchester U1722
14West Ham1720
15Everton1616
16Palace1716
17Leicester1714
18Wolves1712
19Ipswich1712
20Southampton176

Latest posts

Back
Top