Speculation ThaiSweetChili's annoying, but traditional, totally unfounded Summer15 rumours thread
- Thread starter Blaarev
- Start date
- Status
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
We've given Shinji the number 20 shirt, so the deal won't go ahead.
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Feriol
Well-Known Member
It seems some people are not happy that we are not some players first choice to sign for, and that we shouldn't bother.
Personally I am pleased to see that we now have the financial clout to put other teams out of the running, and convince players of our ambition.
IF Cambiasso were to do a u-turn and want to come back, would he be welcomed after he rejected us for West Ham, and when that fell through looked close to signing for Villa, then Chelsea etc...
Personally I would have him back because he is a good player, which is what matters.
Personally I am pleased to see that we now have the financial clout to put other teams out of the running, and convince players of our ambition.
IF Cambiasso were to do a u-turn and want to come back, would he be welcomed after he rejected us for West Ham, and when that fell through looked close to signing for Villa, then Chelsea etc...
Personally I would have him back because he is a good player, which is what matters.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
He has said he would prefer to go to Leverkusen - it doesn't particular mean that he isn't keen to come to Leicester.
SwedeFox
Well-Known Member
I am all for some baseless speculation but is there any reason whatsoever to believe that?
That Cambiasso was/is a good player, every reason. He was good and is good. The point Feriol makes is valid. Is the footballer in question a good player and do the Club believe that he can improve the team ? If the answer is yes then what is printed in the press and repeated on-line is irrelevant.
SwedeFox
Well-Known Member
No, the part I put in bold - that a player who rejected us a couple of weeks ago would suddenly change his mind.
Feriol
Well-Known Member
No basis whatsoever. The question was there to determine if some of the people questioning our signings desire to be here would (theoretically) hold Cambiasso to the same standard. Or whether his quality would be more important.
I did put the IF all in capitals but perhaps I should have been clearer. Sorry for the confusion.
it seems none of ourmidfield targets have signed for other clubs so i guess we will still be chipping away trying tget the signature of Inler, Aranquis even Cambiasso, personally i think Austin is another player we could attract, its a reasonable price for a guaranteed 15 goals next season
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Do you think that us loaning them Konchesky is linked to our chances of signing Austin?
Motown Fox
Well-Known Member
Once he's been there a week it's more likely they'll stick the price of Austin up.
Lako42
Well-Known Member
Nope, Cambi can politely go and find another club.
I find it astonishing anyone thinks we are desperate enough to take a player who scoped out two rivals a head of us despite us doing everything yo keep him here, its sad.
I cant imagine that Is what the owners want their brand associated with, sad, pathetic desperation.
I find it astonishing anyone thinks we are desperate enough to take a player who scoped out two rivals a head of us despite us doing everything yo keep him here, its sad.
I cant imagine that Is what the owners want their brand associated with, sad, pathetic desperation.
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
Seems to be a rumour going around that Mahrez has signed a new 4 year deal.
FryattFox
Well-Known Member
Has there been a pitch update recently?...
You're probably on the wrong forum for that one....
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Manchester C | 4 | 12 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 4 | 10 |
| 3 | Newcastle | 4 | 10 |
| 4 | Liverpool | 4 | 9 |
| 5 | Aston Villa | 4 | 9 |
| 6 | Brighton | 4 | 8 |
| 7 | Nottm F | 4 | 8 |
| 8 | Chelsea | 4 | 7 |
| 9 | Brentford | 4 | 6 |
| 10 | Manchester U | 4 | 6 |
| 11 | Bournemouth | 4 | 5 |
| 12 | Fulham | 4 | 5 |
| 13 | Tottenham | 4 | 4 |
| 14 | West Ham | 4 | 4 |
| 15 | Leicester | 4 | 2 |
| 16 | Palace | 4 | 2 |
| 17 | Ipswich | 4 | 2 |
| 18 | Wolves | 4 | 1 |
| 19 | Southampton | 4 | 0 |
| 20 | Everton | 4 | 0 |
