Polar Bear
Well-Known Member
It's all a trade off isn't it? We all know the midfield desperately needs strengthening, if that means selling one of our decent defenders and re-investing the money elsewhere I for one don't have a problem with that.
Polar Bear said:It's all a trade off isn't it? We all know the midfield desperately needs strengthening, if that means selling one of our decent defenders and re-investing the money elsewhere I for one don't have a problem with that.
SilverFox said:I do!
We have only just got the defence sorted, and anyone worth their salt will tell you that if you are going to build a team you start by building from the back.
Sylla has a reputation in Scotland, and there was talk mid season of Hearts being interested. Equally Rab has a reasonable reputation up there. Lets start by sheding some of the dead wood and actually make a decent go of it next year.
Naughty Fox said:Agreed!!
PFKAKTF FOX said:IMO if we were to sacrifice a defender, I would think the most likely casualties would be either Gerrbrand or Maybury, both would command a fee.
Also Gerrbrand appears to be a defender that RK has doubts about, he is a good reader of the game and is fairly good in possession, but does struggle with the more physical aspects of the Championship, also under Kelly we have looked more vunerable defensively and have conceeded more goals when Gerrbrand has been playing.
IMO Kelly will move him on, probably back to a Swedish team and recoup a sizeable chunk of the fee and go for a more reliable 'British type' centre half.
SilverFox said:Paddy and Paddy for me are the most settled we have been at the back since Elliott and Taggart played as a regular partnership. To break that up now would be really dumb.
PFKAKTF FOX said:It is a viable option when your squad does not contain one decent winger and you dont have a pot to piss in, so it means we have to cut our cloth and try to make the most out of the assets we do have.
Squad wise we have a fairly decent spine and I would say that with the right tactics we have a very strong centre to our team. We have decent centre halfs in the two Paddys and Nissa is certainly no slouch, whilst in midfield Hughesy, Weso and Williams would be as good a central midfield as most in this division.
Football isnt about fashionable formations, it is about picking your best team and the formation and tactics that get the maximum effect. I am merely offering an opinion, it is blatantly obvious that we are desperately short of quality wingers and that we will not have the funds to fill these gaps, so why not make best use of the resources available.
PFKAKTF FOX said:Just a thought but if funds are so limited and we are restricted to what we can do, how about this as a formation and line up using the existing squad.
Henderson
McCarthy
Kisnorbo
Johansson
Stearman
Hughes
Weso
Williams
Sheehan
Hume
Fryatt
With that team and formation, we would possibly need another left wing back and a central midfielder and possibly if funds allowed a goalkeeper.
Cover would come as follows :
GK - Douglas / Logan
RWB - Maybury / Sylla
LWB - New Signing / Tiatto (If he stays) / Hamill (?)
CB - Gerrbrand / Stearman
CM - New Signing / Stearman (Poss Def Mid) / Maybury (Poss Def Mid)
CF - O'Grady / Hammond / Chambers / Dodds
This is without allowing for any new signings and apart from the Left wing back berth and additional options in central midfield we dont look too lightweight, plus RK may well be able to wheel and deal in a couple of positions which may allow further strengthening.
really? i would have had him down as more of a SHOOT! man or at least Big Breasted over 40's housewives....Foxes_Trust said:Rob Kelly said he was a 4-4-2 man at the Trust AGM with the occasional use of alternatives to counter the opposition
Foxes_Trust said:Rob Kelly said he was a 4-4-2 man at the Trust AGM with the occasional use of alternatives to counter the opposition
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |