Barack Obama

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barack Obama has finally broken from American tradition, and will become the first black person to enter the White House not holding a mop.

Sorry, but that's just made me laugh my head off.
 
Yes i reckon. The US isn't stupid. it knows Iraq has been a strategic disaster which has not only turned the international community against them but has also fuelled the fires of extremists, using it as an example of US imperialism etc. I find it hilarious how people just assume that because America invaded Iraq its going to do the same with Iran. The fact is America knew Iraq was weak-Saddam was a pathetic mess after the gulf war, and the US knew he would be a walk over. Iran's a different case. Plus looking at recent developments even the Bush administration is willing to be diplomatic-negotiations with N.Korea have seen them taken off the US's official State Sponsors of Terrorism list.

With Obama in charge, unless there is extreme provacation, there will be no military action against Iran. The only way it will happen is if they attack first (and most likely area would beIsrael)-and they know if they did that they'd be ****ed...

So yeah I reckon...
 
Yes i reckon. The US isn't stupid. it knows Iraq has been a strategic disaster which has not only turned the international community against them but has also fuelled the fires of extremists, using it as an example of US imperialism etc. I find it hilarious how people just assume that because America invaded Iraq its going to do the same with Iran. The fact is America knew Iraq was weak-Saddam was a pathetic mess after the gulf war, and the US knew he would be a walk over. Iran's a different case. Plus looking at recent developments even the Bush administration is willing to be diplomatic-negotiations with N.Korea have seen them taken off the US's official State Sponsors of Terrorism list.

With Obama in charge, unless there is extreme provacation, there will be no military action against Iran. The only way it will happen is if they attack first (and most likely area would beIsrael)-and they know if they did that they'd be ****ed...

So yeah I reckon...

DD, you say firstly that the USA look upon Iran as a different case, meaning they would put up a harder fight than Iraq, so therefore the invasion is off. You then sign off with saying Iran know they would get the shit kicked out of them if they started anything. So surely USA have not invaded because they don't want to, or have any need to.
 
Last edited:
DD, you say firstly that the USA look upon Iran as a different case, meaning they would put up a harder fight than Iraq, so therefore the invasion is off. You then sign off with saying Iran know they would get the shit kicked out of them if they started anything. So surely USA have not invaded because they don't want to, or have any need to.
Iran's a different case as the US can't go in there now alone by themselves and act unilaterally like they did with Iraq, they would never get it through congress etc.

They'd have the shit beaten out of them if they attacked Israel as there would be a coalition fighting them.
 
Plus Iran is still militarily weak in comparison to the US don't get me wrong, its just not as easy a target as Iraq was. If the US wanted too they could destroy Iran in a conventional war. but its not going to happen.
 
Iran's a different case as the US can't go in there now alone by themselves and act unilaterally like they did with Iraq, they would never get it through congress etc.

They'd have the shit beaten out of them if they attacked Israel as there would be a coalition fighting them.

They did Iraq alone? I thought other nations were involved on that one.
 
You know what i mean BG. The war in Iraq didn't have the same amount of countries in the coalition as Afghanistan, and the American commitment in troops is alot larger then anyone else-its their war (well Bush and the Neo-Cons at the Pentagon) not the international community, thats what i'm trying to get at.
 
You know what i mean BG. The war in Iraq didn't have the same amount of countries in the coalition as Afghanistan, and the American commitment in troops is alot larger then anyone else-its their war (well Bush and the Neo-Cons at the Pentagon) not the international community, thats what i'm trying to get at.

I know exactly what you mean DD.......:icon_bigg
 
I'm with DD in concerns to Iran. It's all different ball game to Iraq and too much for the Americans to take on. Just like Venezuela would be too complicated for any attack (political or military).

Behind the curtain, Tehran is fairly westernised. Too many friends elsewhere.
 
I'm even more pleased Obama has won. I'm currently doin my dissertation on counter-terrorism and all of his policies on counter-terrorism fit in line with the recommendations i've read throughout the academic literature on the subject by various experts in the field. Obviously this doesn't guarantee success or even that he'll actually turn these ideas into policy, but its a good start!
 
Iran will carry on developing their nuclear program behind closed doors, like they have been, regardless of the fact Obama is now at the helm.

Its business as usual on that front.
 
Which some may feel is more geared towards protection against Israel and other middle eastern countries than USA.

'Dinnerjacket' (sp) has gone on record saying he would like to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth. Hardly protection talk :102:
 
'Dinnerjacket' (sp) has gone on record saying he would like to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth. Hardly protection talk :102:

and the reasoning he wants to wipe them off the face of the Earth? Because of Israel's aggresive nature to fellow countries in the middle east.

Israel threaten attack in 2003 against Iran and their past history of relations with Islamic countries in the ME suggested they would be more than willing.
 
and the reasoning he wants to wipe them off the face of the Earth? Because of Israel's aggresive nature to fellow countries in the middle east.

Israel threaten attack in 2003 against Iran and their past history of relations with Islamic countries in the ME suggested they would be more than willing.

Was they provocked :102: Do you have a link to this 'attack'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1946
2Arsenal2040
3Nottm F2040
4Chelsea2036
5Newcastle2035
6Manchester C  2034
7Bournemouth2033
8Aston Villa2032
9Fulham2030
10Brighton2028
11Brentford2027
12Tottenham 2024
13Manchester U2023
14West Ham2023
15Palace2021
16Everton1917
17Wolves2016
18Ipswich2016
19Leicester2014
20Southampton206

Latest posts

Back
Top