highland fox
New Member
Because he generally still looks hungry for the game. His off the ball work is a lot more harder to come by in a player than a goalscorer like Fowler is.
Sorry but IMO that is utter Bullshit
Because he generally still looks hungry for the game. His off the ball work is a lot more harder to come by in a player than a goalscorer like Fowler is.
Selling Matty Fryatt would leave the balance sheet, both current and projected, in a very healthy state for an 'investor' like Mandy
Sorry but IMO that is utter Bullshit
Monkeys will fly out of Mandaric's arse before he invests a speculative £8m in players to gain promotion.
Weirdos?
Finding strikers like Sheringham with the ability to create space and bring players into the game are at minimum. There's plenty of players with the ability to score goals given the chance.
Monkeys will fly out of Mandaric's arse before he invests a speculative £8m in players to gain promotion.
So now your argument is based around him now wanting to come here because bigger clubs are after him. A few minutes ago you were saying he's past it.
The players he is shifting will be on comparable or higher wages than the majority that have come in. We wil not have to pay severance of their contracts as they will have chosen to leave for other clubs. Therefore given that more players have been released than have been signed i very much doubt that Mandaric has in reality actually outlayed any money thus far. I won't mention season ticket sales and/or improved sponorship deals +decreased kit costs.
I'm retiring from this Thread,its clearly for the insane
It's my response when I can't understand somebody's opinion and that person doesn't have a good enough grasp of the English language to tell me why they are right and I am wrong.It's OK, it just Melton's response if people disagree with him or when he has realised that he may have a jaded opinion on a subject and he may in fact be not right!
You are saying Fowler is past it,Sherringham is 41 ffs,he's finished,had it,fecked.He barely got his lazy arse onto West Ham's bench last season.I can't believe you are being serious
It's OK, it just Melton's response if people disagree with him or when he has realised that he may have a jaded opinion on a subject and he may in fact be not right!
Surey that speaks volumes. Why would Celtic waste 2-3 million on a has been that's only going to give them 20 games a season. During them 20 games he won't even be able to "hit a cows asre with a banjo" according to Matt.the likes of Celtic are offering him 2-3 mil.
It's my response when I can't understand somebody's opinion and that person doesn't have a good enough grasp of the English language to tell me why they are right and I am wrong.
I'm prepared to accept I may be wrong, but you are failing to deliver a counter argument, you are failing to tell me why Leicester City Football Club would be better off with Matty Fryatt than they would with Robbie Fowler.
I'm asking to be proven wrong FFS, not telling you I'm right.Or maybe Melton believes that his opinion carries more weight than anyone else - that he's the poster who declares what's right and what's not.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 23 | 37 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 23 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Leicester | 23 | 17 |
18 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
19 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |