Board Out, Kelly Out, Stowell Out

[Dour]

to tell the gods honest truth, yes it was

Last time I answer any of your questions then, snitch.

 

[Lako42]

Last time I answer any of your questions then, snitch.

dour dont be like that, im not allowed to lie my mum said.

 

[Melton Fox]

dour dont be like that, im not allowed to lie my mum said.

She's a fine one to talk, you ask her where she was last Wednesday night :icon_wink

 

[stevewalshwasgod]

She's a fine one to talk, you ask her where she was last Wednesday night :icon_wink

nice one melts! cheered me up! (and I need it the state our clubs in!)

 

[highland fox]

Are we a better team than this time last year?,how have we improved under Kelly?

 

[Yorkshire Vixen]

Are we a better team than this time last year?,how have we improved under Kelly?

no and no which is why they all have to go

 

[homer]

Are we a better team than this time last year?,how have we improved under Kelly?

When we sacked Levein we were actually in the relegation zone - and now we are a full three points above it

That's what I call a damned successful twelve months.......

 

[newtonfox]

Are we a better team than this time last year?,how have we improved under Kelly?

gone on then say it

"i told you so" :icon_roll :icon_bigg :icon_wink

 

[highland fox]

gone on then say it

"i told you so" :icon_roll :icon_bigg :icon_wink

If there was even a slight improvement then I'd want him kept on

 

[newtonfox]

If there was even a slight improvement then I'd want him kept on

i know he's a nice bloke and all :icon_roll :icon_lol:

 

[highland fox]

i know he's a nice bloke and all :icon_roll :icon_lol:

Its just this 'But he's had no money' stance...what has he done to warrant getting any.

 

[Babylon]

That's what I call a damned successful twelve months.......

 

[Babylon]

Its just this 'But he's had no money' stance...what has he done to warrant getting any.

Well he did sign Johnson... oh hang on.

 

[newtonfox]

Its just this 'But he's had no money' stance...what has he done to warrant getting any.

Well he did sign Johnson... oh hang on.

:icon_bigg

 

[highland fox]

Well he did sign Johnson... oh hang on.

McCauley aside the players he's signed were no better than what we already had IMO and in some cases worse but because they didn't cost anything then its ok,its his judgement that worries me

 

[newtonfox]

McCauley aside the players he's signed were no better than what we already had IMO and in some cases worse but because they didn't cost anything then its ok,its his judgement that worries me

at the end of the day HF its a risk and i dont think that if everything dose go ok for MM he will risk letting RK lose with his money unless he controls which players are brought and give RK a chance

 

[stevewalshwasgod]

Rob Kelly is a lovely bloke....

 

[Redditch Fox]

at the end of the day HF its a risk and i dont think that if everything dose go ok for MM he will risk letting RK lose with his money unless he controls which players are brought and give RK a chance

In the remote chance that MM takes over from the living dead who are 'running' the club, I would have thought that Kelly gets the push rapido.

If by mischance, Kelly stays, no board would be likely to trust his judgement. Some managers have to wheel and deal at the basement end.....Kelly's track record in that respect is worse than patchy and would not inspire confidence to let him spend any serious money. Worse still there is nothing to suggest that he is capable of getting the best out of those players he would bring in.

Let's face it, Rob Kelly is a dud as a football manager. I am sure there are lots of jobs he could do but managing a professional football club is not one
of them.

 

[Hazzman]

McCauley aside the players he's signed were no better than what we already had IMO and in some cases worse but because they didn't cost anything then its ok,its his judgement that worries me

It makes it worse that us fans could spot better alternatives.

 

[Chrysalis]

yes, we wouldn't exist without their money. the cuts in wage budgets is also evidence they are working to balance the books




Its widely accepted that MM 'investment' will mostly be loans. this is riskier than the current board trying to run the club 'within it means'.

since we are going round in circles, this will be my last post on the subject.

you havent answered my question I didnt ask have they put money in the past to get the club cheaply. I will ask again.

I asked are they garuanteeing the clubs well been with personal wealth? ie. putting money in NOT for shares. I am assuming the answer is no if you sidestep the question again or dont respond and if it is no why should MM garuantee with his personal welath if the current board are not?

Different standards for different owners?