Charlton Post Match Thread
- Thread starter Dour
- Start date
- Status
beaumontfox
New Member
Especially if it's said really fast.....
beaumontfox
New Member
You two as well, even if it was very briefly!
andy15
New Member
He was such an idiot, where did he come from? He wasnt one of the 2 guys in the incident was he?
beaumontfox
New Member
Yes think he was the one who hit Jim's lad.
cleefox
New Member
Yep you've sussed me out. I am going to Villa though, first game in 26 years. :icon_wink
beaumontfox
New Member
You mean that wasn't you I met at Preston?:icon_eek::icon_eek:
cleefox
New Member
Figment of your imagination. :icon_wink Still trying to work how its cost me so much not going.
beaumontfox
New Member
I don't want to even guess at how much not going would save me......
cleefox
New Member
I was told that was why you drink at games. :icon_wink Helps to numb the pain of thinking about it.
beaumontfox
New Member
I don't know where you get the impression I drink..........
The Old Fox
Well-Known Member
You're a Leicester fan, it is the antithesis of being in AA: LCFC drives everyone to drink
.
.
Did someone mention drink? - Mine's a large one! (Glad there's no unfortunate inuendo there!)
Treebeard
New Member
For me, yesterday's performance was partly summed up by Cate earlier. People can criticise a lack of effort by the players, but I'm not entirely sure it's valid across the board. Cort yes, who expected everything to come to him and not to have to work for anything, but the rest, I'd tend to disagree.
The problem was in the formation. That was so so clear. If you were there, you would have seen polar-opposites in the sides on show. Charlton had width. Not players who get wide, but players who belong and ply their trade out wide. We didn't, and this meant that they could firstly stretch us all over the place, as cate I think said, all to danny mills, who was very effective but largely unchallenged; and secondly, they knew where our attack was coming from - straight down the middle. They knew that if it went to the wings, we were ineffective. SO they crowded the centre, and snuffed out any chance of freedom for out strikers.
People who went to the palace game would have seen the inclusion of Levi as sub making a huge difference. He played well, knows the wing role, and stretches their defence allowing midfield and attack to join.
I place the result firmly at the feet of Megson. N'gotty, Levi, possibly Ferreira or Kaebi would've seen an entire different performance across the team in my opinion.
The problem was in the formation. That was so so clear. If you were there, you would have seen polar-opposites in the sides on show. Charlton had width. Not players who get wide, but players who belong and ply their trade out wide. We didn't, and this meant that they could firstly stretch us all over the place, as cate I think said, all to danny mills, who was very effective but largely unchallenged; and secondly, they knew where our attack was coming from - straight down the middle. They knew that if it went to the wings, we were ineffective. SO they crowded the centre, and snuffed out any chance of freedom for out strikers.
People who went to the palace game would have seen the inclusion of Levi as sub making a huge difference. He played well, knows the wing role, and stretches their defence allowing midfield and attack to join.
I place the result firmly at the feet of Megson. N'gotty, Levi, possibly Ferreira or Kaebi would've seen an entire different performance across the team in my opinion.
newtonfox
Active Member
dont like him....................but he's only been with them a week :icon_conf:icon_conf:icon_wink
Last edited:
Treebeard
New Member
Formation is something that can be and was immediate tho. I'm still up for giving him a chance. I'm not saying Megson out. I'm just blaming him and not the players for the performance. It wasn't lack of effort as some have said. It was 10 men not knowing the formation they should be adopting, and when they received the ball in midfield, having zero options. It was like hot potato.
Fox Fan
Well-Known Member
To have any kind of chance of play offs this season we need to get in:
1)A left back
2)A left Mid
3)A right Mid
and we need to do it quickly, every game that passes were looking worse and worse. Levi should play LM for the time being while we search for someonw with more quality.
Infact scrap that list we need basically an entire midfield!
1)A left back
2)A left Mid
3)A right Mid
and we need to do it quickly, every game that passes were looking worse and worse. Levi should play LM for the time being while we search for someonw with more quality.
Infact scrap that list we need basically an entire midfield!
NN Fox
Well-Known Member
After watching the 'highlights' on The Championship this morning I would suggest we need to start with the defence!
Bilborough Fox
Member
Best form of defence is to attack the opposition not sit on your heels waiting for them to come on to you. Think we need afresh approach, something called attacking football.
The Old Fox
Well-Known Member
A poor midfield puts extra pressure on the defence. We know that the defence is nornally sound. Doesn't Megson like wingers, or does he just not rate ours?
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
| 5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
| 7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
| 13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
| 15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
| 16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
| 18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |
