LeeCovFox
Well-Known Member
I am a big fan of stability providing there is progress. This season has been a huge improvement on anything we have seen, both performance and position-wise, for a long time. I think the performances before February show that the players were regularly producing the goods for Pearson and that he was tactically getting it right to win matches. Performances since February have been severely lacking and, as I have said on numerous occasions, the manager must be accountable (see Lee, I do understand it) for this. I don't believe his being accountable should be a cause for his being sacked due to the aforementioned improvements seen this season.
It would appear to me that this season is slipping away from us due to a severe confidence shortage and fatigue. I think the only thing that will halt this is, unfortunately, the end of the season. I would be more than happy to see Pearson try again next season given what he has shown for the majority of this season. Seeing as I don't think a new manager would halt the decline, I don't see what benefit would be got by bringing somebody new in now either. Add to that the fact that there are no available managers out there who I see as an improvement, bar Mcdermott(sp), and it would merely add to the increasing debt.
Call me a spill, stooge or **** if you like, but I shan't be crying out for more change, upheaval and debt just yet thank you.
I agree with you that the season is slipping away and that only the end of the season, with Pearson in charge at least, will halt that. However if it goes the way it is looking now we will miss out on the play offs and I fail to see how that would represent any progress at all. I give Pearson credit for having us second in the league a couple of times but the fact is that he wasn't able to keep it going. It's no good being second in January if it looks likely that we will be about where we were last season come May.
The benefit isn't in sacking Pearson of itself but in replacing him with somebody better. There are managers who are either available now or who we would likely be attractive to who have better records in this league than Pearson does. Stability is only good if it breeds success. For the money he has spent I think saying that Pearson is doing a good job is a very hard sell indeed.
Whilst this season is better than any since Pearson was last here, and than many seasons before his first spell, that tells us nothing other than that the past decade of so has been crap. I'm not happy with just doing better than we have in the worst decade in the club's history. Pearson gets away with a lot by virtue of doing a half decent job in a very poor era for our club. He is fortunate that he is judged against such shit. It means he doesn't have to do very well to con the fanbase into believing that he is a very good manager. I'm willing to say that he will never win promotion from this league. And if I'm right, what's the point in him being here?
Last edited: