Would you have said the same when Morrison was piss poor for Sheffield Wednesday at league one level? I remember some of them saying he was the worst player they had ever seen play for them. Morrison has ability when managed right - exactly the issue with most of our team at present. Why can you recognise the ability of Morrison based on past performances but not players in our own team? Is it just because he is now showing some ability again whereas our players currently aren't? Baffling..
As I've said several times, because I don't see that that is the issue. I don't see where people are getting the idea from these players are just underperforming. They've never shown that they are that great and this is just a spell of poor form.
Nugent has never been a prolific scorer.
Beckford has only been a prolific scorer in the lower leagues.
Fernandes is an energetic ball winner, but he's not going to provide us with any creativity.
Mills, by all accounts from Reading fans has always been an error-prone and inconsistent defender.
Ditto St. Ledger from PNE and Boro fans.
Danns was heralded in a medicore, relegation scrapping side and Palace fans don't seem to miss him, he was poor at Birmingham when they were a promotion chasing side.
Bamba has been refered to as being "bombscare Bamba" by his past teams.
We've seen Wellens, King, Dyer and Gallagher for enough time now to know they are all too inconsistent.
People all seem to be happy to accept our midfield is not good enough, because we've seen them for several years now, which I agree on, but why do people all of a sudden think Beckford and Nugent will score bagfuls of goals with the right service (and imo they really haven't lacked that much service anyway), or that Mills, St. Ledger and Bamba will suddenly become consistent defenders, when their record suggests differently?