What I can't make my mind up on, is this.
Is Chilwell the new Andy King or is it Matty James?
So don’t put the majority of your effort into improving your overall game? Interesting.
A lot of talk about James. He is ok in the right game, was excellent at Chelsea. Generally a James- Ndidi partnership doesn’t work, in fact I haven’t seen any criticism of Ndidi and I thought he was pish yesterday, including losing the ball for their goal. Wes was also in no mans land.
Imo Ndidi is being slightly over hyped by many.
I find him too negative and often makes very silly mistakes that cause us issues.
The partnership of him and James is so mind numbingly boring that it's hard to watch.
Constantly standing next to each other and usually this is barely any further up the pitch than the defenders.
Iborra pissed it for me, he was hauled from the team as he was finding his feet.
No, I think overall suggests an over arching set of goals, let’s say attacking, defending, passing, tackling, movement off the ball, and corners.Is the overall game part of it purely corners?
The answer (as mentioned above) is a three man midfield, comprising of Ndidi, Iborra and Silva.
I'd also go with Mahrez slightly behind Vardy, Chilwell and Albrighton as wing backs and bring in Dragovic too.
We have tried this formation a couple of times last season, and against Man City this season - all with woeful results. Despite it working well for us in the great escape.
Unfortunately our players don’t seem capable of adapting to anything nowadays other than 4-4-2 or a variant of it (4-2-3-1, 4-4-1-1).
At least we’re not Arsenal.You're right that we tried a poor variation of it unsuccessfully against Man City. However, our dismal performance that day was mainly after we abandoned it after about 30 mins.
I think this suits more of our players than the formation usually play and is worth trying for a few matches:
View attachment 14089
We have tried this formation a couple of times last season, and against Man City this season - all with woeful results. Despite it working well for us in the great escape.
Unfortunately our players don’t seem capable of adapting to anything nowadays other than 4-4-2 or a variant of it (4-2-3-1, 4-4-1-1).
No one even moans ....
You're right that we tried a poor variation of it unsuccessfully against Man City. However, our dismal performance that day was mainly after we abandoned it after about 30 mins.
I think this suits more of our players than the formation usually play and is worth trying for a few matches:
View attachment 14089
As if the Stoke fans know what it's like to be in a libraryI was in C1, next to SK4. Like being in a library as the Stoke fans rightly pointed out.
They do now.As if the Stoke fans know what it's like to be in a library
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |