Slightly off topic but still relevant, I decided to look at all of Liverpool substitutions and timings so far this season in the Premier League, So far:
- 79, 80 and 91
- 59, 66 and 89
- 45, 64 and 86
- 45, 61 and 68
- 11, 78 and 91
- 83 and 83
- 70, 70 and 90
- 59 and 63
So. if you take out the outliers in that data: 11 (injury) and 45, 45 - tactical, the average time that Liverpool substitute is 75 minutes. In other words only 1/6 of the available time.
You certainly could argue alongside this that a substitute after 85 minutes is purely running down the clock, Liverpool have used this 7 times (I have included both substitutions on 83 minutes).
Overall then, poor old Klopp has subbed off 11 players in 8 available games to 'save them,' in other words his wish for 5 substitutions is solely based on him wanting to be able to use more players of quality that wouldn't be available to those teams with thinner and less quality squads.
So,, there is hardly any shock or horror to see that the other teams who want to support 5 substitutions are Man U and Man city, yes, you've guessed it, they have large squads with more quality and Internationals on their bench.
The truth is they are worried because in my opinion empty stadiums have leveled off the home advantage and allowed referees to referee pretty much fear free. 'Smaller' clubs have realized this and are taking advantage of it, going away and playing more without fear.
Liverpool, and the two Manchester clubs can go and **** right off.