The fact Mendy was 3rd in the pile......**** sake
Completely agree with you I just do not see Nacho as the main man for us, as part of a front two absolutely whether or not BR thinks this remains to be seen. Has BR played Nacho and Daka together I can not remember?
If you look at some of the quotes on our buys, before the season started, plenty were more than happy with the 5.Today highlighted once again how horrific our transfer business was last summer.
We have five players out injured, one of whom is Bertrand who looked Sunday league level until his knee did us all a favour and collapsed on him.
We pick twenty in the squad today and the two senior absentees are Soumare and Vestergaard. Despite occasional positive signs from each of them this season, there is no doubt that they've both been horrific additions on current evidence.
The other two additions are named on the bench. Daka has potential no question. He had a decent run in Oct/Nov but since he's been poor. He looks like he's got a lot to learn still. It was a very big punt to spend over £20m on him.
Lookman was only a loan but signing a left winger to play on the right was idiotic. He's useless there and a waste of time being here. Yet again, we've fecked up recruitment on that side. He's fine as a second left winger but what is the point of spending £15m on that? Same as Under for me, flashes of talent but ultimately no good.
Not too bad the way KDH won the ball back and passed to Maddison either.And let’s talk about Maddison’s cross
Deary me, truly ****ing amazing
He wasn't.
We needed to get rid of Choudhury or Mendy in the summer.
Newcastle wouldn't pay for Choudhury. We had an offer for Mendy to go out on loan, so that's the choice that was made. By the time the loan fell through the deadline for naming the squad had gone.
I know we were trying to offload him, which is even worse tbh. Is there any reason we could have not registered Soumare and named Mendy in the squad and risked having a 24 men squad?
Hindsight is a wonderful thing !
We could have done that. But that was before we knew how bad Soumare was going to be.
I was one of many City fans that thought we'd chucked a million quid away on Vardy for example.
He won't though. He really won't.We'll sell him this summer and I don't expect there to be any shortage of suitors.
He'll then go on and score plenty of goals for whoever is smart enough to sign him and play him regularly.
Then we'll wonder why on earth we sold him.
Bertrand looked bloody good in preseason, but got covid [the bad one] never seemed to recover.That's what we employ a recuitment team and analytical team for. They are supposed to know absolutely everything about prospective signings. No fan is properly equipped to know whether a signing is good or not. I was one of many City fans that thought we'd chucked a million quid away on Vardy for example. But Steve Walsh knew what he was doing.
Employing Congerton was a massive error by Whelan and Rudkin.
When WBA offered £5m there were quite a few saying, "I'll drive him there myself"A lot of people thought that after his first year with us. So is it fair to judge other signings after less than a year?
A lot of people thought that after his first year with us. So is it fair to judge other signings after less than a year?
He scored...
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |